After the Iraq invasion, the Pentagon thought it was worth killing up to 29 civilians to take out Saddam Hussein
Nikola Solic/Reuters
The ace of spades, of course, was dictator Saddam Hussein. He was considered so important that US planners decided that an operation killing the deposed leader woud be worth it if it were likely that no more than 29 civilians were killed in the process.
"Our number was thirty," according to Marc Garlasco, a former Defense Intelligence Analyst, who spoke with 60 Minutes in 2007. "If you're gonna kill up to twenty-nine people in a strike against Saddam Hussein, that's not a problem.
"But once you hit that number thirty, we actually had to go to either President Bush, or Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld."
In the upcoming book "Kill Chain: The Rise of the High-Tech Assassins," author Andrew Cockburn reports that officials almost always granted permission for operations against high-value targets with the potential to kill that number of civilians. "[A]pproval from higher authority was pretty much pro forma," Cockburn writes. "Following the invasion, General Michael Moseley, then vice chief of staff of the US Air Force, reported that the necessary clearance to risk thirty or more civilian lives in this manner had been requested at least fifty times. In no case had it been refused."
Garlasco said he had recommended 50 such airstrikes against "high-value targets."
Cockburn explains that the shift in military thinking - towards targeting certain individuals in the effort of quickly winning a war - created a need for assassination-style operations that drones would eventually fill.
With the Iraq war, the key targets "were no longer just things- bridges, oil tanks, and power plants - now they could be people."
Victor R. Caivano/AP
In the years that followed, slain commanders in Iraq were quickly replaced by younger ones eager to prove themselves with renewed aggression (a similar phenomenon occurred with cartel leaders during the War on Drugs, which Cockburn also explores).
Rex Rivolo, a former pilot who served in Vietnam, studied the lethality of Iraqi neighborhoods 30 days before and after the death of a commander based there.
"Each killing quickly prompted mayhem," Cockburn writes. "Within 3 kilometers of the target's base of operations, [IED] attacks over the following days shot up by 40 percent."
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- Saudi Arabia wants China to help fund its struggling $500 billion Neom megaproject. Investors may not be too excited.
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- FSSAI in process of collecting pan-India samples of Nestle's Cerelac baby cereals: CEO
- Narcissistic top management leads to poor employee retention, shows research
- Audi to hike vehicle prices by up to 2% from June
- Kotak Mahindra Bank shares tank 13%; mcap erodes by ₹37,721 crore post RBI action
- Rupee falls 6 paise to 83.39 against US dollar in early trade