Buffalo Bills GM accused of going 'rogue' when he cut a star player who'd been there for 9 seasons
Bill Wippert/AP
As NFL teams round down to their 53-man rosters, the Bills decided to part ways with Jackson and his $2.5 million salary after nine years.
Between Jackson's price, age, and increasingly smaller role in the offense, it makes sense that the Bills would cut him, even if he was a popular, stable face of the franchise.
However, it seems that the team may not have been united on the front to do so. Buffalo News reporter Tim Graham said that sources within the Bills said GM Doug Whaley "went rogue" in cutting Jackson:
Bills organization will remain unified when speaking publicly, but two sources tell me Doug Whaley went rogue in cutting Fred Jackson.
- Tim Graham (@ByTimGraham) September 2, 2015
Jackson also made it sound like the move came as a surprise to him:
@Fred22Jackson on GM Doug Whaley: "There's only one person in that organization that I haven't gotten honesty from, and that was him."
- Bucky Gleason (@TBNbucky) September 2, 2015
But what qualifies as "rogue?" In announcing that they were cutting Jackson, Whaley told reporters that the Pegulas, the Bills owners, were on board:
"We also let everybody know that everybody was on board. Reluctantly, because of the magnitude of this player and what he means, not only to the Buffalo Bills, but to the community of Buffalo -- him and his family. So we talked to [owners] Terry [Pegula] and Kim [Pegula] and conversed with them and decided that this was the best time to make that decision."
Deadspin's Kevin Draper also notes that at Rex Ryan's introductory press conference, Terry Pegula said Ryan, Whaley, and president Russ Brandon will report to him and his wife. He added that Whaley will have control of the 53-man roster while Ryan will have control of the game-day roster.
Graham clarified on Twitter that there were people outside of the Pegulas who were not informed of Whaley's decision:
Whaley did speak with Terry and Kim Pegula before Fred Jackson was cut. Two sources tell me they were surprised w/decision but supported.
- Tim Graham (@ByTimGraham) September 2, 2015
There are a lot of key people in football operations, coaching staff and administration who were left out. https://t.co/PZck5QEaXf
- Tim Graham (@ByTimGraham) September 2, 2015
While in the grand scheme of things, the decision to cut Jackson without informing everyone in the organization is not huge. Again, Jackson is on the backend of his career and would have seen a diminished role in the offense.
However, for a team that's trying to usher in a new era with Rex Ryan, seemingly not telling Ryan that a franchise player is being cut from the roster doesn't seem like a good start.
NOW WATCH: 8 mind-blowing facts about Serena Williams
- Rupee falls 6 paise to settle at 83.39 against US dollar
- 10 Fruits to keep you hydrated this summer
- 8 Benefits of drinking hot water every morning
- Best places near Lucknow for a perfect weekend getaway
- Toyota Kirloskar Motor to hike prices on select vehicles from April 1