Mike Huckabee support group has a 'public health' argument against gay marriage
AP
Weeks before Mike Huckabee was set to announce his presidential campaign, a policy group bearing his name told the Supreme Court that gay marriage is a public health risk that could cause premature death.
"Empirical evidence demonstrates that homosexual behavior - especially chronic and habitual practice - is likewise associated with early mortality," Mike Huckabee Policy Solutions wrote in a brief filed in April.
The group, which aims to "support the national policy aims of Mike Huckabee," cited a Danish study from 2013 finding that mortality rates for married lesbians had begun to rise recently and that they were particularly at risk for suicide and death. (As the Los Angeles Times noted, gay couples represented fewer than 1% of the adults in the study, which limited the findings.)
The Huckabee group also analyzed obituaries from "homosexual publications" in attempt to show that married gay people died younger on average than single gay people.
"Mike Huckabee policy solutions and Family Research Initiative beseech this court to show true compassion and kindness for the benefit of millions of American young people who, as a function of behavioral and lifestyle choices encouraged by unwise or uncaring public policy decrees, would die early," the group wrote.
The amicus brief came in a case that the Supreme Court heard last month which considered the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. The brief was filed in support of the states, which are trying to hold onto those bans.
The group wrote "that deference to the States in the regulation of lawful marriage, as well as federalist restraint and humility by this Court, would represent an act of love," the group wrote. "Tough love, perhaps, but love nonetheless."
Huckabee's campaign did not respond to Business Insider's request for comment on the brief, and it's not clear whether he authorized it. The group itself says it's not "authorized, funded, or directed" by Huckabee but that it advocates for his "articulated policies."
A longtime opponent of gay marriage, Huckabee has ramped up his anti-gay marriage rhetoric in recent days. The former Arkansas governor suggested that Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) could defund the judiciary branch if the Supreme Court legalizes gay marriage, and argued that states could disobey a Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage.
In his announcement speech, the former governor doubled down on comments that Christianity trumped any ruling from the high court.
"The Supreme Court is not the Supreme Being," Huckabee said. "It cannot overturn the laws of nature or of nature's God."
Gay rights advocates brushed off Huckabee's campaign announcement, saying that the ex-governor's gay rights stances are "hateful" and out-of-touch.
"There's nothing hopeful about opposing marriage equality, and no matter what city Mike Huckabee launches his campaign in, he can't erase his long history of hateful rhetoric, like comparing being LGBT to alcohol abuse," JoDee Winterhof, HRC's Vice President for Policy and Political Affairs said in a statement. "If Mike Huckabee bases another campaign on his opposition to marriage equality, he is going to find out that his hateful rhetoric has left him isolated in a country where more than 6 in 10 voters support marriage equality."
- I spent 2 weeks in India. A highlight was visiting a small mountain town so beautiful it didn't seem real.
- I quit McKinsey after 1.5 years. I was making over $200k but my mental health was shattered.
- Some Tesla factory workers realized they were laid off when security scanned their badges and sent them back on shuttles, sources say
- World Liver Day 2024: 10 Foods that are necessary for a healthy liver
- Essential tips for effortlessly renewing your bike insurance policy in 2024
- Indian Railways to break record with 9,111 trips to meet travel demand this summer, nearly 3,000 more than in 2023
- India's exports to China, UAE, Russia, Singapore rose in 2023-24
- A case for investing in Government securities