Salman Khan, a free man!
Advertisement
In major reprieve for Salman Khan, the Bollywood superstar has been acquitted of all charges in the 2002 hit-and-run case for lack of incriminating evidence against him.
"On basis of evidences produced by the prosecution, the appellant cannot be convicted, no matter how differently the common man thinks," the Bombay High Court ruled on Thursday.
He was convicted of all charges by a sessions court earlier this year in the case relating to 2002 when Salman’s Toyota Land Cruiser had crashed into five men sleeping outside a bakery on Hill Road in Bandra in the early hours of September 28. One person was killed and four others were injured.Salman Khan 's lawyers had argued that his driver Ashok Singh was behind the wheels. He had then been sentenced to five years in jail.
But later, theBombay HC suspended the sentence after the actor appealed against his conviction.On Wednesday, the HC said three important things: The prosecution had failed to bring material on record that could prove beyond reasonable doubt that Salman was driving the car in the incident; the prosecution failed to convince the court that he was under the influence of alcohol; Ravindra Patil , who was Salman’s bodyguard when the incident happened (died in 2007), was a ‘wholly unreliable witness' and the credibility of his statement that the actor was driving drunk and had ignored his warnings repeatedly was questionable.
"If the witness is partly reliable, then corroboration is required. Ravindra Patil cannot be considered as a wholly reliable witness," the court said, asserting that the sessions court had made a mistake by relying on his statement.
Also, not examining singer Kamaal Khan, who was also in Salman Khan's car that night, was an error, the court observed.
(Image credit: Indiatimes)
Advertisement
"On basis of evidences produced by the prosecution, the appellant cannot be convicted, no matter how differently the common man thinks," the Bombay High Court ruled on Thursday.
He was convicted of all charges by a sessions court earlier this year in the case relating to 2002 when Salman’s Toyota Land Cruiser had crashed into five men sleeping outside a bakery on Hill Road in Bandra in the early hours of September 28. One person was killed and four others were injured.
But later, the
"If the witness is partly reliable, then corroboration is required. Ravindra Patil cannot be considered as a wholly reliable witness," the court said, asserting that the sessions court had made a mistake by relying on his statement.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Indiatimes)
Advertisement
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- Saudi Arabia wants China to help fund its struggling $500 billion Neom megaproject. Investors may not be too excited.
- Catan adds climate change to the latest edition of the world-famous board game
- Tired of blatant misinformation in the media? This video game can help you and your family fight fake news!
- Tired of blatant misinformation in the media? This video game can help you and your family fight fake news!
- JNK India IPO allotment – How to check allotment, GMP, listing date and more
- Indian Army unveils selfie point at Hombotingla Pass ahead of 25th anniversary of Kargil Vijay Diwas
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market