Sorry, Apple: The Lightning port doesn't magically make EarPods sound better
Apple has removed the headphone jack from its newest iPhones . Among other things, that means anyone who doesn't want to go wireless will have to hook up this little guy to their current pair of wired headphones.
In the long, angry lead-up to the headphone jack's removal, one of the common arguments in favor of Apple's decision was that these kind of Lightning headphones would sound better than what we've had up to now. Instead of relying on that dusty old analog port, the thinking goes, we could just tap into the more powerful digital connector that's been sitting there all along.Technically, this is true! But only technically.
Now, the vast majority of people won't notice any of that. I spent a good amount of time switching between pairs of headphones with the same songs - something nobody will do in real life - and even then the changes were practically imperceptible much of the time.
And to be clear: Both of these EarPods are still very bad, in my opinion. That bass can get boomy, the highs often feel recessed, and there's a constant sense of fogginess that obfuscates finer details. They're still okay for a pack-in pair, and still nowhere worth $29 on their own. But if you really care about audio, you already know to stay away. (If you don't, you've probably stopped reading by now.)
That said, Lightning headphones
sound better - but likely only in more expensive pairs. A headphone maker could stuff its own digital-to-analog converters (DACs) and amplifiers into those, supersede the relatively weak audio components that are built into iPhones by default, and make it a revelation on any iDevice you've got.
And so, around the $30 mark, you get something like the new EarPods, which won't work with your other devices, yet bring zero performance benefits. If you don't care about audio, sure, they'll be as they've always been. If you've found a good value over the years, though, keep that dongle handy.