The Fed just fired off a stark warning - and it highlights one of the biggest risks for stocks

The Federal Reserve is done pulling punches. They think the stock market is too expensive, and they want investors to take note.

In the minutes for their July meeting, the central bank explicitly highlighted stretched equity valuations, sharpening their tone compared to previous comments. Here's the key segment (emphasis ours):

"Since the April assessment, vulnerabilities associated with asset valuation pressures had edged up from notable to elevated, as asset prices remained high or climbed further, risk spreads narrowed, and expected and actual volatility remained muted in a range of financial markets."

In other words, the Fed is basically saying that they warned you about high valuations before, but prices continued to climb - and guess what - now the situation is even worse.

Later in the minutes, several participants noted that these extended stock prices, combined with continued low interest rates, have led to an easing of financial conditions. However, they were split on what that means for the market going forward.

One camp argued for tighter monetary policy, saying that the Fed's previous efforts to remove accommodation have been "offset by other factors," limiting their effectiveness.

Another faction said that "recent rises in equity prices might be part of a broad-based adjustment of asset prices to changes in longer-term financial conditions." And, as such, increasingly expensive stocks might not provide "much additional impetus to aggregate spending on goods and services."

The extended valuations referenced by the Fed are also a source of worry for other market experts, like Dr. John Hussman, the president of the Hussman Investment Trust. By his count, stock market valuation measures now exceed every point in history except for one extreme reached in March 2000 - when equities topped leading into the bursting of the dotcom bubble.

And when you look at it from the perspective of individual sectors, conditions actually look more stretched than in 2000, when excessive valuations were concentrated mostly in tech, according to Hussman.

He goes even further and splits the S&P 500 into deciles, based on the price-revenue ratios of stocks. With the exception of the richest portion - which is still the most extended since the tech bubble - every decile is currently at or within 2% of its most extreme historical valuation, Hussman's data show.

But amid all of the warnings being sounded by Hussman and a handful of Fed officers, there are some within the central bank that think lofty stock prices are justified. Here's another portion of the minutes (emphasis ours):

"A couple of participants noted that favorable macroeconomic factors provided backing for current equity valuations; in addition, as recent equity price increases did not seem to stem importantly from greater use of leverage by investors, these increases might not pose appreciable risks to financial stability."

So there you have it. The Fed itself is divided, similar to the general investing public. But it can't be denied that the central bank is kicking its crusade against higher valuations into a higher gear, so stay tuned to see if the dissenters can be swayed.