Tesla is getting slammed for doing something that it would pointless to avoid
AP Photo/Justin Pritchard
Tesla bear Colin Langan, lead auto analyst at UBS, has a "sell" rating and a $160 target price on Tesla stock, which is now trading above $200.
In a tough-minded research note published Wednesday, he brushed off the Q3 surprise, chalking it up to the ZEV credits, and did not offer optimistic thoughts about the fourth quarter.
"We see TSLA's guidance for positive GAAP net income in Q4 as very challenging." he wrote. "Excluding ZEV credits, Q3's $0.71 profit would have been a $0.18 loss. With no ZEV, higher opex, and [approximately] flat [quarter-over-quarter] deliveries, achieving the target Q4 profit will be tough, in our view."
For what it's worth, when Tesla CEO Elon Musk was asked about ZEV credits on a conference call after earnings, he took the opportunity to lay into the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the agency that oversees the ZEV regime for the biggest state that requires automaker to meet ZEV requirements.
He had already upbraided CARB on Tesla's second-quarter earnings call, but in light of Langan's analysis, his disdain for the way the program is administered took on new meaning this time around.
Calling the "CARB ZEV credit mandate is incredibly weak" and insisting that it "needs to be fixed," Musk went on to say that ZEV credits are actually a crummy business for Tesla.
"There were some quarters where we simply cannot even find a buyer for credit," he said. "And then when we can find a buyer, it's typically fifty cents on the dollar for the ZEV credit."
REUTERS/James Glover II
For starters, Tesla's gross-margin per vehicle is increasing, and as production increases, that should logically lead to more consistent profits.
But on the "ZEV Factor" - Tesla, unlike all other significant carmakers, doesn't build any cars that generate tailpipe emissions. That's why it accrues ZEV credits that it can sell. And it can sell those credits whenever it wants - or, as Musk said, take a frustrating hit on its ZEV sales when it can't get what it considers to be full value.
This math is speculative, but if Tesla did unload a lot of ZEV credits in Q3 for fifty cents on the dollar, it could have picked up $280 million rather than $139 - and notched an even higher profit.
Also, why would we consider Tesla's ZEV sales are somehow an adjacent business, unrelated to its core operations, where presumably investors are looking for signs of future profitability? If you make zero-emission electric cars, you're going to rack up ZEV credits in ZEV states and to a degree can considers them a product that you're "created," in a sense. They're actually an important part of the business plan. Benjamin Zhang/Business Insider
Sure, a no one wants 14 profitless quarters in a row, and Musk did make clear to his team that a profitable quarter would be helpful to the cause. If they sold every ZEV credit they could find, well, that's a valid and legitimate decision. It isn't against the rules to sell ZEV credits - Tesla would be foolish not to.
Meanwhile, the company is on track to deliver more vehicles in 2016 than ever before. Tesla could be moving into a new phase, and getting hung up on how it turned a profit in one quarter is a distraction.
- Markets end FY24 on buoyant note amid positive global cues
- SRM Contractors IPO allotment – How to check allotment, GMP, listing date and more
- Rupee falls 6 paise to settle at 83.39 against US dollar
- 10 Fruits to keep you hydrated this summer
- 8 Benefits of drinking hot water every morning