A Stanford economist has a fascinating theory to explain why women may be less likely to quit in a competition than men

Advertisement
A Stanford economist has a fascinating theory to explain why women may be less likely to quit in a competition than men

woman running jogging exercise

Shutterstock

There's value in simply finishing the race.

Advertisement
  • In the 2018 Boston Marathon, men dropped out at higher rates than women did.
  • A New York Times op-ed explains a few potential reasons why: For example, women may see success and failure as more fluid than men do.
  • Stanford economist Muriel Niederle suggests that simply finishing the race may be more valuable for women than for men.


In April, The New York Times published an op-ed explaining why women had been less likely to quit the Boston Marathon earlier that month.

The author, Lindsay Crouse, reported that 5% of men had dropped out, compared to 3.8% of women. That means the dropout rates had increased almost 80% since the 2017 race for men and just 12% for women.

Crouse spoke to a number of experts in different fields, including elite distance coach Steve Magness, who told her: "Women generally seem better able to adjust their goals in the moment, whereas men will see their race as more black or white, succeed or fail, and if it's fail, why keep going?"

That is to say, for women, simply finishing the race may be important; for men, winning (or beating their personal best time) may be key. And the implications of this gender difference go beyond marathons, or athletic prowess.

Advertisement

Muriel Niederle, a professor of economics at Stanford University, has done extensive research on gender differences in competitiveness. Generally, she's found that men are more likely to enter - and win - competitions than women are.

But Niederle could speculate as to why the Boston Marathon turned out the way it did.

"For women, just the fact that they finish the race has a higher value for them" than it does for men, Niederle told Business Insider. What's more, that's not necessarily something they decide in the moment, midway through the race - it's something they know from the very beginning.

"Women have more to lose in terms of how they think of themselves, or how they think others will view them, when they give up," Niederle said. "That could make it much more costly for her."

That's possibly because of gender stereotypes that suggest women are relatively weak, or not resilient. If they do quit - a marathon or any other kind of competition - they risk playing into those gender stereotypes, she said.

Advertisement

Men may be more likely to choke under pressure, research suggests

To be sure, there are other potential explanations for women's lower dropout rate during the marathon. Business Insider's Lindsay Dodgson previously reported on a study from the University of St. Gallen, Switzerland that suggests women are less likely than men to choke under pressure.

The researchers looked at the performance of servers in Grand Slam tennis matches and found that men's performance dropped more than women's did at turning points during the match.

One of the study authors, Alex Krumer (who is soon moving to Molde University College in Norway), co-authored another paper on gender differences in performance during judo contests. Results showed that the effect of winning was stronger in men than in women, in that it motivated them to compete and win again.

Taken together, Krumer told me, these findings suggest that "different psychological motives affect men's performance more than they affect women's performance." That might be especially true in a marathon, where the sheer length of the race means there's more opportunity for mental hang-ups to seize control.

As Alex Hutchinson, the author of "Endure," told Krouse in the Times article, "Your physical limits are actually mediated by your brain. In most instances, dropping out is a decision."

Advertisement
{{}}