BANK OF AMERICA: Here's how to trade 'escalating tensions' with North Korea

Advertisement

North Korea missile BI graphics

AP Images / Business Insider

North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile for the first time on July 4, showing it has the capability of reaching the United States. That prompted the United States and South Korea to hold their own ballistic missile drill.

Advertisement

Bank of America Merrill Lynch says there are two possible paths from here: a reduction in tensions or an escalation. The bank examined how the Korean won (KRW) responded to three events in the past that were considered as "destabilizing" in the region:

  1. North Korea pulling out of the International Atomic Energy Agency (June 1994)
  2. North Korea conducting its first nuclear test (October 2006)
  3. North Korea firing at South Korean forces on Yeonpyeong Island (November 2010)

BAML found that the won fell in all three instances, with the largest drop being almost 2% in November 2010. Every instance saw the move completely retraced within eight to 14 business days.

Interestingly, this time around, the won fell by 0.6% in the two days following the event but is now actually stronger by 1.5% at 113.36 per dollar. That is likely due to broad-based dollar weakness that has developed over the past week, in addition to the Bank of Korea lifting its growth forecast.

But, BAML says traders should be prepared in case there are "escalating tensions" on the peninsula, which it defines as including, but not limited to "imposition and tightening of sanctions; intensified rhetoric; additional weapons testing; and military drills" without a conflict.

The analysts note, however, that currency traders also have to consider the US dollar environment (and specifically interest rates adjusted for inflation). So BAML put that together with the rise or fall of tensions and created a handy little matrix:

Advertisement

North Korea

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

NOW WATCH: Wells Fargo Funds equity chief: Shorting anything is 'playing with fire'