BlackRock Got A Wells Notice From The SEC
REUTERS/Eric Thayer
A Wells Notice is a letter from the SEC sent to firms when the agency is planning to bring an enforcement action against them.
The Wells Notice in this case has to do with an employee.
The firm said that Daniel J. Rice III would no longer serve as a portfolio manager for the BlackRock Energy & Resources Portfolio to address any perception of a potential conflict of interest.
Here's the filing:
In June 2012, BlackRock Advisors, LLC ("BlackRock Advisors"), a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. (the "Company"), announced that its then-employee Daniel J. Rice III would, among other things, no longer serve as a portfolio manager for the BlackRock Energy & Resources Portfolio in order to address any perception of a potential conflict of interest as a result of his personal investments and involvement in a family business, Rice Energy LP and related entities. The Company concluded that there was no improper trading within the portfolios managed by Mr. Rice and that no clients were harmed. BlackRock Advisors further announced that Mr. Rice would retire from BlackRock Advisors, which he did in December 2012. Since 2012, BlackRock Advisors has cooperated with the staff of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in an investigation of this matter.
On June 17, 2014, BlackRock Advisors received a written "Wells Notice" from the SEC staff indicating the staff's preliminary determination to recommend to the Commission that the SEC file an action against BlackRock Advisors.
A Wells Notice is neither a formal allegation of wrongdoing nor a finding that BlackRock Advisors violated any law. Rather, it provides BlackRock Advisors an opportunity to respond to issues raised by the SEC staff and offer its perspective prior to any SEC decision.
The SEC staff has taken the preliminary view that BlackRock Advisors' disclosure as it related to Mr. Rice's situation, and its policies and procedures, were inadequate. The Wells Notice indicates that the basis of any action against BlackRock Advisors would be violations of Section 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder, as well as Rule 38a-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. BlackRock Advisors does not believe these provisions were violated.
BlackRock Advisors will continue to cooperate fully with the SEC's inquiry and intends to make a submission to the SEC staff setting forth why no action should be commenced against it.
The Company does not expect any resolution of the matter to have a material adverse effect on its financial results or operations.
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- Saudi Arabia wants China to help fund its struggling $500 billion Neom megaproject. Investors may not be too excited.
- Catan adds climate change to the latest edition of the world-famous board game
- Tired of blatant misinformation in the media? This video game can help you and your family fight fake news!
- Tired of blatant misinformation in the media? This video game can help you and your family fight fake news!
- JNK India IPO allotment – How to check allotment, GMP, listing date and more
- Indian Army unveils selfie point at Hombotingla Pass ahead of 25th anniversary of Kargil Vijay Diwas
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market