Facebook made the rare decision to push back directly at Elizabeth Warren and her criticism of the company, but its attempt to defend itself backfired spectacularly
- Facebook allows politicians to run ads that are not subject to third-party fact-checking, and drew ire after running ads from the Trump campaign that made false claims about candidate Joe Biden.
- To draw attention to this policy, Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren intentionally ran ads with misinformation on the platform.
- Facebook then made the unusual choice of pushing back publicly at Warren's criticism in a tweet directed at the candidate over the weekend, but that strategy appears to have backfired.
- Warren responded to Facebook on Twitter, telling the company "You're making my point here ... It's up to you whether you take money to promote lies."
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
Warren, seeing an opportunity after Facebook tagged her in the tweet, seized it."You're making my point here," she wrote. "It's up to you whether you take money to promote lies," referring to the debunked ads that ran on Facebook.Warren's response pointed out that the ad violated Facebook's own misinformation policies, which prohibit information debunked by fact-checkers. Since 2016, Facebook, has had a "newsworthiness exemption," in which it allow content that violates community standards if the company believe that "the public interest in seeing it outweighs the risk of harm." Notably, this exemption does not apply to swearing, and Facebook's policies for ads aren't as strict as its policies for the rest of its content. Facebook removed one of the Trump campaign ads, which referred to Biden as a "b--th," because it violated profanity standards for ads on the platform.
In response to the tweets between Warren and Facebook, some Twitter users pointed out that Facebook was comparing itself to broadcast networks, which are regulated by the FCC and legally liable for content that they post - something Facebook currently isn't on the hook for.
With overwhelmingly negative responses, Facebook's tweet did not seem to garner the response Facebook hoped for. Many replied to the tweet by pointing out that Facebook's response comparing its practices to those of a broadcast network doesn't make sense (Facebook has made painstaking efforts in recent years to tell the tech press and regulators it isn't a media company). Others said they want to delete Facebook.
Facebook did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
@ewarren looks like broadcast stations across the country have aired this ad nearly 1,000 times, as required by law. FCC doesn't want broadcast companies censoring candidates' speech. We agree it's better to let voters-not companies-decide. #FCC #candidateuse https://t.co/WlWePjh1vZ- Facebook Newsroom (@fbnewsroom) October 12, 2019
You're making my point here. It's up to you whether you take money to promote lies. You can be in the disinformation-for-profit business, or you can hold yourself to some standards. In fact, those standards were in your policy. Why the change? https://t.co/CE766Jpwoo- Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) October 13, 2019
- Cannes Lions 2021: On Day 3, Dentsu Webchutney brings home 2 Silver Lions
- Best laptop for students in India in 2021
- Twitter rolls out new update for iOS allowing users to share tweets to Instagram stories
- If you are vaccinated, IndiGo Airlines is giving discounts on airfares
- Microsoft joins Apple in $2 Trillion Club