Here's the survey that $100 million VC fund Sinai Ventures uses to get direct feedback from its portfolio company founders

Advertisement
Here's the survey that $100 million VC fund Sinai Ventures uses to get direct feedback from its portfolio company founders

Mike Raab

Mike Raab

Mike Raab of Sinai Ventures

Advertisement
  • Mike Raab is a writer and investor at Sinai Ventures in San Francisco.
  • Founded in 2017, Sinai Ventures has invested in companies such as Ro, Brud, Carta, Dosist, Front App, and Grow Mobility.
  • The firm sends an annual short survey to its portfolio company founders asking for direct feedback and polling entrepreneurs on the startup and fundraising ecosystem.
  • The survey revealed insights from founders about why they picked their investors, how VCs can be helpful to them, and the books they'd recommend to other founders.
  • Click here for more BI Prime content.

After my first year as an investor at Sinai Ventures, I was curious about how our portfolio founders thought of us as investors, as well as how we could best improve as partners to help our companies succeed.

In order to answer these questions, I devised this simple survey using Typeform, which we subsequently sent to each and every founder of Sinai portfolio companies.

The goals were threefold: to gather actionable feedback on how we could be better partners and investors; to poll founders on market conditions and how they think about fundraising, investors, incubators, and more; and to have the survey itself be quick and easy to complete.

In total, 36 founders completed the survey in January 2019. Participating portfolio companies included Dosist, Haute Hijab, Kapwing, Dutchie, Drivetime Media, Blink Identity, Heartbeat, Universe, Glamcam, Seattle Food Tech, Tomorrow Ideas, Swiftmile, Skydrop, Doorport, Esusu, EEVO, Lightout, Naked Labs, Honeylove, MANTL, Openland, Tingles, CSPA, Skopenow, Candid Co., Playbook, Squarefoot, GovInvest, Harness Wealth, BrandCommerce, High Definition Vehicle Insurance (HDVI), NewCraft, Necto, Sketchbox, Screening Room, and OK Credit.

Advertisement

Some of the results were surprising and illuminating, while the feedback from founders empowered us to focus on helping them where they need it most - and hopefully exceed their expectations by the next time we issue this annual survey.

Let's get to the results, which we've abridged slightly for reader clarity.

{{}}

The first question dives right in and asks how our entrepreneurs rate us on a scale of 1-10.

The first question dives right in and asks how our entrepreneurs rate us on a scale of 1-10.

This gave us a quantifiable rating, which we used to calculate our Net Promoter Score (NPS). NPS allows us to track our performance and founder rating over time, so we can be sure to hold ourselves accountable.

We also wanted to know how founders thought their investors (including us) could be most helpful to them and their companies.

We also wanted to know how founders thought their investors (including us) could be most helpful to them and their companies.

In addition to offering eight high-level categories, it was important to include an open-ended "Other" option, in case founders had a request outside of these domains.

Advertisement

Unsurprisingly, founders rely on their investors first and foremost to help when a subsequent fundraising process is underway.

Unsurprisingly, founders rely on their investors first and foremost to help when a subsequent fundraising process is underway.

Fundraising help may include giving feedback on a pitch deck, pitch practice, and most importantly making introductions to other investors. Customer introductions, PR, and recruiting help are also highly valued.

The "other" responses primarily specified other types of introductions and networking help that founders desired. Interestingly, no one wanted their investors' help on their product!

We also included a classic question that investors ask entrepreneurs, "What keeps you up at night?"

We also included a classic question that investors ask entrepreneurs, "What keeps you up at night?"

Knowing our founders' biggest worries and concerns empowers us to focus on helping them in those areas, so that they can sleep easier.

Advertisement

It's no surprise that customer acquisition, hiring, and growing revenue were the top concerns of founders.

It's no surprise that customer acquisition, hiring, and growing revenue were the top concerns of founders.

If a company can solve these challenges, other challenges (raising follow-on capital, market corrections, competition) are easier to face.

Depending on the stage of the company, some startups are able to raise capital very quickly, while others may spend many months fundraising.

Depending on the stage of the company, some startups are able to raise capital very quickly, while others may spend many months fundraising.

However, fundraising traction/speed (especially at early stages) isn't always correlated with the eventual outcome of a company. Some of the most successful companies had difficulty fundraising at some point, while others that have easy access to capital don't always meet expectations.

Advertisement

A majority (75%) of respondents raised their most recent fundraising round in 1 to 3 months.

A majority (75%) of respondents raised their most recent fundraising round in 1 to 3 months.

A lucky 11% were able to raise in less than one month, while the remainder took 4 months or more to close their rounds.

So how many pitch meetings are generally necessary for founders before they close a round?

So how many pitch meetings are generally necessary for founders before they close a round?

As investors know (and founders should understand), most pitches do not result in an investment. VCs typically invest in a small percentage of all the deals that they see. This gives entrepreneurs the opportunity to practice and evolve their pitch, incorporating feedback and addressing major concerns from previous pitch meetings.

Advertisement

Over half of respondents pitched at least 21 different VC firms, with over a quarter pitching more than 30 VCs.

Over half of respondents pitched at least 21 different VC firms, with over a quarter pitching more than 30 VCs.

When given a choice, what factors do founders consider in choosing their lead investor?

When given a choice, what factors do founders consider in choosing their lead investor?

With so many sources of capital for startups these days, VCs look to differentiate themselves to make their case to founders.

Differentiation could include services they provide, market expertise to be proffered, strategic personal connections to be made, or even the brand and reputation of the firm itself. My hypothesis was that the most important factors for founders choosing a lead investor would be Deal Terms, a Firm's Brand, and Individual Partner Expertise.

Advertisement

Surprisingly, it turns out that deal terms and a firm’s brand were not as important as the “enthusiasm and alignment” and “good character” of investors!

Surprisingly, it turns out that deal terms and a firm’s brand were not as important as the “enthusiasm and alignment” and “good character” of investors!

This feedback emphasizes that reputation is imperative for VCs, and that showing passion and having conviction about a company can win deals — even if another firm has a stronger "brand" or offers better terms.

With the growing popularity of incubator and accelerator programs, we were curious if program graduates would recommend them to other entrepreneurs just starting out.

With the growing popularity of incubator and accelerator programs, we were curious if program graduates would recommend them to other entrepreneurs just starting out.

It's more and more common for early-stage startups to enter accelerator or incubator programs, as these programs themselves proliferate behind the success and prominence of Y-Combinator and TechStars. But are they worth it?

Advertisement

In fact, the vast majority of founders do recommend their incubator/accelerator program to other founders.

In fact, the vast majority of founders do recommend their incubator/accelerator program to other founders.

We’re always working to find the right balance of support, introductions, and check-ins with founders without becoming overwhelming or overbearing. To take advantage of the opportunity to hear directly from a large number of founders, we also asked them which books they would recommend to each other, in order to share the results with all of our portfolio companies’ founders.

We’re always working to find the right balance of support, introductions, and check-ins with founders without becoming overwhelming or overbearing.

To take advantage of the opportunity to hear directly from a large number of founders, we also asked them which books they would recommend to each other, in order to share the results with all of our portfolio companies’ founders.
Advertisement

"The Hard Thing About Hard Things" by Ben Horowitz was the no. 1 recommended book, while other recommendations focused on categories outside of entrepreneurship, such as creativity and happiness.

"The Hard Thing About Hard Things" by Ben Horowitz was the no. 1 recommended book, while other recommendations focused on categories outside of entrepreneurship, such as creativity and happiness.

Personally, I was surprised with the diversity of recommended books — only 4 books were recommended by more than one founder!

One internal debate was whether or not to keep this survey anonymous in hopes that it would compel “more honest” feedback.

One internal debate was whether or not to keep this survey anonymous in hopes that it would compel “more honest” feedback.

Ultimately, we decided that trust and honesty is imperative to our relationships with founders, and that we could only address specific concerns/feedback if we knew who provided it. In our email to founders with the survey link, we asked earnestly that they answer candidly, even if they felt a little uncomfortable.

Advertisement

There you have it — the simple founder feedback survey that Sinai Ventures uses to continuously innovate and improve as investors and partners.

There you have it — the simple founder feedback survey that Sinai Ventures uses to continuously innovate and improve as investors and partners.

Re-issuing this survey on a regular basis allows us to track our progress and be held accountable by our most important partners.

Mike Raab is a writer and investor at Sinai Ventures in San Francisco. He blogs about a variety of topics including media, technology, and venture investing at TheRaabitHole.com and on Twitter at @hithereimmike.