India lost contact with its moon lander, and an astronomer thinks the spacecraft crashed into the lunar surface
- India's first moon-landing attempt appears to have ended in failure.
- The Chandrayaan-2 mission's Vikram lander was descending toward the moon when it suddenly went off-trajectory just 1.3 miles above the lunar surface.
- Moments later, mission control lost communication with Vikram.
- An astronomer said data from a radio telescope on Earth indicates the lunar lander may have crashed.
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
India's moon-bound spacecraft may have crashed into the lunar surface during its descent on Friday, an astronomer said.
Called Vikram, the robot is part of a larger $140 million mission called Chandrayaan-2. Vikram deployed from an orbiting spacecraft earlier in the day to make its descent, and everything was going as planned until about 1.3 miles (2.1 kilometers) above the surface of the moon's south pole.
At that point, the Vikram lander spacecraft diverged from its expected trajectory. Moments later, spacecraft operators control lost contact with its communications systems. Mission control fell silent, and somebody patted India's space program director, K. Sivan, on the back.
This occurred during a landing phase that Sivan had previously said would be "15 minutes of terror," the New York Times reported. The spacecraft's on-board computers had to complete a series of steps in the right sequence, with no room for error.
Sivan later announced that the landing had been going according to plan until the 1.3-mile mark.
"The data is being analyzed," he said.
Why Vikram has probably crashed into the moon
Screens in mission control, which showed data related to Vikram's landing, do not paint a great picture for the fate of the spacecraft.
"Those screens reported the spacecraft was 1.09 kilometers [0.6 miles] above the surface, traveling at a horizontal speed of about 48 meters per second [107 mph] and a vertical speed of about 60 meters per second [134 mph], just over 1 kilometer [0.62 mile] from the landing site," Jason Davis, digital editor at the Planetary Society, wrote in a post.
Astronomer Cees Bassa, who works with the LOFAR low-frequency radio telescope, was monitoring the spacecraft's descent on Friday when the situation appeared to devolve.
Bassa said in a tweet that the data indicated the lander "has crashed."
"After the rough braking phase the Doppler curve from @radiotelescoop shows some wiggles, and then, at 20:20:01UTC the signals disappeared," Bassa tweeted.
If the spacecraft did crash, it's unclear whether it tumbled to the surface, rockets blazing, or simply went dead and fell.
"Knowledge of the altitude and velocity at the end of the rough braking phase should be able to tell if the loss of signal matches the time it takes to free fall to the surface," Bassa said.
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has the most powerful camera system for looking down at the moon. But it could take about a month for that team to release a photo of the crash-landing site.
Not the first moon-landing failure this year
It's possible that Vikram's loss of signal was a communications glitch. If the spacecraft did stick the landing, India would become the fourth country to make a successful landing on the moon without damaging its spacecraft.
If Vikram failed, however, it'd mark the second time a lunar-landing spacecraft has crashed into the moon this year.
India's mission has been relatively low-budget compared to many space missions. According to the Indian news website Business Today, the entire mission cost the Indian government the equivalent of $142 milion. The BBC cites a figure of $145 million.
Uh oh.... the signals have disappeared... pic.twitter.com/ODV2M2WdgQ- Cees Bassa (@cgbassa) September 6, 2019
- Best budget 5GHz routers for faster speeds
- Naidu to chair virtual meeting with parties on RS agenda for budget session
- TRS MPs to meet on Sunday to chalk out party's strategy for Budget session of Parliament
- EXPLAINED: India’s annual Economic Survey
- With COVID expenses rising, taxpayers need more than an insurance rebate, says a wealth manager