+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Mick Mulvaney said the classified documents recovered from Trump's Mar-a-Lago were 'serious' but may not have justified the raid

Aug 21, 2022, 12:41 IST
Business Insider
Former chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, left, listens to President Donald Trump, right, speak at a luncheon with members of the United Nations Security Council in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington on Thursday, Dec. 5, 2019.AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
  • Mick Mulvaney said the classified documents seized at Mar-a-Lago were "serious stuff."
  • However, he said it may not have been enough of an "emergency" to justify the August 8 raid.
Advertisement

Former chief of staff to President Donald Trump Mick Mulvaney said Friday that although Trump's retrieval and storage of Sensitive Compartmented Information from the White House "caught his attention," it may not have justified the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago.

On August 8, the FBI searched Trump's Palm Beach, Florida, home and seized 11 sets of classified documents, including Top Secret Sensitive Compartmentalized Information, which is considered the highest level of sensitivity a classified document can receive.

Trump has said all the materials were declassified and that he had a "standing order" to declassify documents, but 18 former senior White House officials pushed back on this claim, including Mulvaney.

Mulvaney told CNN's Alisyn Camerota that the sensitive documents were "serious stuff" not meant to be in the former president's home, but that there would need to be an "emergency" in order to justify the use of a search warrant to retrieve the documents.

"Well, a search warrant is really only warranted if it's an emergency, right? If the evidence is that either someone is going to see it who shouldn't, or if the evidence is going to disappear or be destroyed or be moved," Mulvaney said.

Advertisement

An application cover sheet for Trump's search warrant unsealed Thursday revealed the FBI is investigating if Trump violated federal laws related to the willful retention of national defense information, concealment or removal of government records, and obstruction of a federal investigation.

Mulvaney also said in the interview that Trump would not have taken the classified documents if he did not "perceive it to be in his own interest, a benefit to him," but that it may have been an oversight.

"They have to present evidence to the court to show probable cause," Mulvaney told CNN, adding "the fact that they can fill out that affidavit tells me they think that they have something."

Next Article