The gunman in the FedEx shooting didn't have a 'red flag' hearing. A prosecutor said the mass killing exposes loopholes in the gun control law.
- Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears said on Monday that Brandon Hole never had a "Red Flag" hearing.
- Law enforcement officials had seized a gun from Hole's home in March 2020.
- The case was never filed as a Red Flag peition because his family willingly gave over the gun.
The suspected gunman in the FedEx mass shooting did not have a 'Red Flag' hearing, despite having a shotgun previously seized over mental health concerns, Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears said at a press conference on Monday.Brandon Hole opened fire at a FedEx facility in
View all Offers
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Blue Haze, 8GB RAM, 128GB Storage) I Extra upto Rs.1000 off on Exchange₹ 29999Buy On
- 18% OFF
Redmi 9A (Nature Green, 2GB RAM, 32GB Storage) | 2GHz Octa-core Helio G25 Processor | 5000 mAh Battery₹ 6999₹ 8499Buy On
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Gray Sierra, 8GB RAM, 128GB Storage) I Extra upto Rs.1000 off on Exchange₹ 29999Buy On
- 19% OFF
Redmi Note 10 (Aqua Green, 4GB RAM, 64GB Storage) -Amoled Dot Display | 48MP Sony Sensor IMX582 | Snapdragon 678 Processor₹ 12999₹ 15999Buy On
- 18% OFF
Redmi 9 (Carbon Black, 4GB RAM, 64GB Storage) | 2.3GHz Mediatek Helio G35 Octa core Processor₹ 8999₹ 10999Buy On
In Hole's case, police detained Hole and seized a shotgun from Hole's home in March 2020 after his mother called authorities saying her son was feeling suicidal, Mears said.When a seizure of a gun takes place without a warrant, a provision requires police to file a petition that explains the probable cause behind taking the firearm.
But in Hole's case, the petition was not filed because the family agreed to forfeit the firearm in question and did not pursue a return of the firearm.Thus, there was no court hearing in which a judge could have further banned Hole from possessing a gun. Mears said in Monday's press conference that the incident shows shortcomings in Indiana's Red Flag law.
"Because we have 14 days, our ability to have access to meaningful medical history, meaningful mental health records, is severely limited," Mears said. "I think it's important to note that the statute only authorizes us to issue search warrants to seize a weapon. We do not have the ability to use a search warrant or get a court order to get someone's mental health records or medical history, which would be particularly relevant in trying to make these types of determinations."
- Here’s how brands can avoid making our athletes’ win at Tokyo Olympics all about themselves
- Tokyo Olympics: India beat Argentina 3-1 to enter the quarters in men's hockey
- Sony sells more than 10 million units of the PS5 despite supply shortage since launch
- From Adani Group to Tata Motors and banks — these 17 stocks have already lost over 10% in last one month
- Google, Amazon, IBM and many more are hiring business analysts across the country