The anonymous senior White House official who wrote 'A Warning' said there is 'no doubt in my mind' that Trump demanded quid pro quo from Ukraine

SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky speak during a meeting in New York on September 25, 2019, on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.

• The anonymous senior White House official behind the book "A Warning" said they were sure that President Donald Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into a political opponent.
• Additionally they said that "everyone in the White House, including the president himself," understood that as well.
• The senior Trump administration official, who anonymously authored an explosive op-ed in The New York Times and the new book "A Warning," hosted an AMA (or "ask me anything") on the internet forum Reddit.
• Anonymous also wrote that they believe there are more potential whistleblowers because "many people have witnessed the president's corruption."
• Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

The anonymous senior White House official behind the book "A Warning" said on a forum that there is "no doubt in my mind" that Trump demanded quid pro quo from Ukraine "in order to disrupt the 2020 election."

The senior Trump administration official, who also anonymously authored an explosive op-ed in The New York Times, hosted an AMA (or "ask me anything" interview) on the internet forum Reddit.

In a thread, the author, dubbed "Anonymous," not only said they were sure that Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into a political opponent, but that "everyone in the White House, including the president himself," understood that as well.

"Now the question is whether it rises to the level of 'high crimes and misdemeanors,'" Anonymous wrote in the Reddit thread. "I personally think that it now does."

The anonymous author went on to say that they do not "cheer on" Trump's potential impeachment, writing that, at the outset of the impeachment inquiry, they believed in reserving judgement "until the facts were on the table."

"Impeachment is a sobering, last-resort process for holding the commander in chief accountable, not something to be undertaken because we think the President's tweets are vile and his rhetoric is ugly," Anonymous wrote in the thread. "We politicize this at our own peril. If Congress goes about it the wrong way, impeachment will further divide our nation."

Anonymous also wrote that they believe there are more potential whistleblowers because "many people have witnessed the president's corruption." The author added that the bravery of the two intel whistleblowers and witnesses testifying in the ongoing impeachment inquiry will compel them to come forward.

"They are hesitant to speak up because they see what he does to his critics," Anonymous wrote. "The anonymous intelligence community whistleblower, and the brave public servants testifying before Congress, will convince them to be on the right side of history.

• Read more:
• The anonymous author writing critiques from inside the Trump administration has dropped breadcrumbs pointing to their identity - here's everything we know
• The anonymous White House official says in their new book that Trump aides had to dumb down his briefings to one key point repeated over and over
• Newly released excerpts from 'A Warning' written by an anonymous White House official paint a wild picture of the Trump presidency
• The new book written by an anonymous White House official claims staff react to Trump's tweets like finding your 'elderly uncle running pantsless across the courtyard'