Lex Greensill did have 'some form of contract' while working for David Cameron, senior civil servant tells MPs
- David Cameron's former advisor
Lex Greensilldid, in fact, have a contract while working inside the UK government, the Cabinet Secretary has said.
- Simon Case had previously suggested that Greensill was not a contracted employee.
- However, he now says he has seen appointment letters that suggest "some form of contract" was drawn up.
- Greensill's role as an unpaid advisor is at the centre of inquiries into
lobbyingby the former Prime Minister.
View all Offers
- 35% OFF
Seagate One Touch 2TB External HDD with Password Protection – Black, for Windows and Mac, with 3 yr Data Recovery Services, and 4 Months Adobe CC Photography (STKY2000400)₹ 5114₹ 5114Buy On
- 25% OFF
realme Smart Watch 2 Pro (Space Grey) with 4.45 cm (1.75") HD Super Bright Touchscreen, Dual-Satellite GPS, 14-Day Battery, SpO2 & Heart Rate Monitoring, IP68 Water Resistance₹ 4499₹ 4499Buy On
- 69% OFF
Fire-Boltt Beast SpO2 1.69” Industry’s Largest Display Size Full Touch Smart Watch with Blood Oxygen Monitoring, Heart Rate Monitor, Multiple Watch Faces & Long Battery Life (Black)₹ 2499₹ 2499Buy On
- 60% OFF
TP-Link TL-WA850RE N300 Wireless Range Extender, Broadband/Wi-Fi Extender, Wi-Fi Booster/Hotspot with 1 Ethernet Port, Plug and Play, Built-in Access Point Mode₹ 1139₹ 1139Buy On
- 23% OFF
HP Pavilion Aero, Ryzen 5-16GB/512GB SSD 13.3-inch WUXGA Laptop, Ultra-Thin & Light 970 gm, 400 Nits Anti-Glare 100% RGB Display/B&O Audio/Fingerprint Reader/Backlit KB/Win 11 Ready, 13-be0190AU₹ 69490₹ 69490Buy On
Simon Case, the UK government Cabinet Secretary, has told Members of
Greensill, the Australian billionaire founder of the now-collapsed
One such inquiry is the Boardman Review, investigating the nature and circumstances of the unpaid advisory role held by Greensill in Downing Street and the Cabinet Office in the early 2010s.
In a letter to the chair of PACAC, William Wragg MP, published Tuesday, Case sought to clarify comments he and fellow civil servant Darren Tierney, director-general of propriety and ethics at the Cabinet Office, had made to the committee on April 26.
Case wrote: "Since we gave evidence to the Committee, we have seen signed appointment letters that cover the period from April 2012 to March 2014. As Darren Tierney said to the Committee, the letter of appointment did contain provisions about Mr Greensill's conflicts of interest and duties on him regarding conduct, propriety and confidentiality.
"However, my initial assessment of these letters suggests to me that some form of contract was in place whilst he was working for the Cabinet Office."
Tierney had previously told the committee that civil servants had not found a contract. He said: "What we have found so far are an appointment letter and then subsequent reappointment letters, which set out some conditions on his appointment-things like the Official Secrets Act, confidentiality, using the Business Appointment Rules when he leaves-but so far we have been unable to identify the contract."
A business card for Greensill, obtained by the Labour Party, described Greensill as a "Senior Advisor" in the Prime Minister's office, including a Downing Street email address and direct landline. Tierney told the committee that Greensill had a pass for the Cabinet Office and Number 10.
In the committee meeting of April 26, PACAC member David Jones MP asked Tierney if it was possible that Greensill may have acquired "information that would have been of assistance to him in deciding the basis upon which he would offer commercial services to the Government" while working in Downing Street. Tierney described this as a "potential conflict of interest."
Jones suggested it looked like a "screaming, glaring conflict of interest". Tierney replied: "Yes, it does."
In his letter, Case told Wragg that as the Boardman Review is ongoing, it was not possible to publish the appointment letters. When asked about the potential to publish the appointment letters or provide them to the committee, Case had previously told the committee that "I cannot think why not, but if there is a reason why not we will let you know."
A source on the committee told Insider that the letters have not yet been provided to them.
- Amazon Great Republic Day Sale — Best deals and offers on Apple iPhones, iPads, and more
- ‘Extreme fear’ is ruling the crypto markets — is this an opportunity or a warning sign for investors?
- El Salvador's president hits back on Twitter after rating agency Moody's issues warning over its bitcoin buying
- Xiaomi 11T Pro 5G vs OnePlus 9RT 5G: Specs, price and features compared
- One of the largest cryptocurrency swapping platforms just lost $1.3 million as users failed to update approvals
- India extends suspension of international passenger flights till February 28 amid rising COVID-19 cases
- Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition will boost its Metaverse plans
- Sony shares slump after Microsoft plans to buy largest game company
- Mythology audiobooks
- Electric car Championship
- India's win in Centurion
- Millionaires Employees
- Car with Waiting Period
- Tax Saving Investment
- Urban Company
- New Year 2022
- Upcoming new laptops
- Bank Holidays in January
- Valuable NFT Projects
- Xiaomi 11i hypercharge
- GST Input tax credit
- Public Holidays in 2022
- RBL Stocks
- Upcoming Smartphones in 2022