The Mississippi abortion case going before the Supreme Court is the most consequential challenge to Roe v. Wade in decades
Supreme Courton Wednesday will hear the biggest challenge to abortionrights in almost three decades. Mississippiis asking the court to overturn the 1973 landmark ruling Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear a case that directly challenges the constitutional right to an abortion established nearly 50 years ago.
Mississippi has called on the nation's highest court to overturn that 1973 landmark ruling, Roe v. Wade, a decision that would dramatically transform the country's abortion laws.
The GOP-led state passed a
After the state's sole abortion provider, Jackson Women's Health Organization, sued Mississippi, lower courts struck down the law as unconstitutional. But Mississippi Department of Health state health officer Thomas Dobbs appealed to the Supreme Court, now stacked with a 6-3 conservative majority, which agreed to take up the challenge.
"It reflects the will of the people of Mississippi to protect life and women's health by limiting elective abortion after 15 weeks. Working together, we can find ways to both empower women and promote life," the state's Attorney General Lynn Fitch said in a recent video about the case.
Mississippi has also asked the high court to overrule a subsequent 1992 Supreme Court decision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which maintained that states cannot impose an "undue burden" on abortion rights.
"Roe and Casey are egregiously wrong. They have proven hopelessly unworkable. They have inflicted profound damage. Decades of progress have overtaken them. Reliance interests do not support retaining them. And nothing but a full break from those cases can stem the harms they have caused," the state wrote in its brief to the court.
Wednesday's arguments on the case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, represents the high-stakes battle between anti-abortion advocates and pro-abortion rights supporters that has divided the country for generations.
Should the Supreme Court fulfill Mississippi's demands, the door would open for a slew of states to enact abortion restrictions or near-total bans on the procedure, substantially limiting abortion access to large swaths of the population. Twelve states, including Mississippi, have "trigger" laws to ban abortion that would automatically take effect if the court overturns Roe. In that scenario, a patient seeking an abortion in Mississippi would have to travel 428 miles to the nearest provider, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health data organization that supports abortion rights.
Those bans are likely to affect vulnerable populations like women of color, low-income women, and young women, who are less able to travel the long distances to obtain the care they seek if Roe is overturned, Kimberly Kelly, a sociologist focused on abortion
Women of color in the US already experience more unintended pregnancies because of factors such as racial and income inequalities and a lack of access to affordable healthcare, the Guttmacher Institute found.
A post-Roe future is "going to create just a perfect storm of concentrated human misery," Kelly said, adding that reversing the decades-old ruling would harm women, rather than "empower" them, as Mississippi has claimed.
The Center for Reproductive Rights, an abortion-rights organization set to defend Mississippi's abortion provider at the Supreme Court, hopes the justices will follow precedent to avoid that potential reality.
"It would really create chaos and fear and heartache for many people who are making serious and thoughtful decisions about their bodies, families, lives and futures, and really create two Americas, especially for folks who would be able to get out of state versus those who cannot," Jenny Ma, senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights, told Insider.
"This is a pivotal moment for the rule of law," she added. "The Supreme Court has recognized and protected this right for over 50 years under the Constitution. Myself as a lawyer — who's been trained to know that the rule of law will be followed — that part of me is optimistic because I know that the court has been asked several times to overrule Roe, including the same arguments that Mississippi has made, and rejected those arguments every single time. I think it would be very backwards if this case were to reach a different decision."
- Pathan, Liger, Godfather: Here’s a list of forthcoming movie releases that will decide the fate of the multiplexes
- Taj Mahal continues to lose its sheen due to pollution in the Yamuna and industrial emissions
- ICICI Bank market-cap hits ₹6 lakh crore as its stock rises to a record high
- Jio, Airtel could emerge stronger weakening Vodafone Idea further, say analysts
- Foreign investors pour over Rs 12,000 cr in Indian equity in last 10 days