The probability of dying after developing coronavirus symptoms is 1.4% in Wuhan, China, new research suggests - far lower than initial estimates
STR/AFP via Getty Images
- More than 227,000 people have been infected with the new coronavirus worldwide, and 9,300 have died. The city of Wuhan, China, where the outbreak started, was hardest hit.
- According to a new study about the Wuhan cases, the chance a patient who shows coronavirus symptoms dies is 1.4%.
- That figure is much lower than previous estimates for Wuhan.
- The researchers found that symptomatic patients older than 59 were five times more likely to die from the coronavirus than people between the ages of 30 and 59.
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
The new coronavirus has spread to nearly 160 countries, infecting more than 227,000 people. The pandemic has left experts scrambling to calculate patients' risk of dying.A study published today in the journal Nature Medicine suggests that the chances a patient in Wuhan, China, would die after developing symptoms was 1.4% as of February 29.
The authors also found that symptomatic case-fatality risk increased with age: "There is a clear and considerable age dependency in symptomatic infection (susceptibility) and outcome (fatality) risks," they wrote.
A patient's probability of dying increases with ageIn addition to calculating overall case-fatality risk, the researchers broke down that risk by age bracket.
They found that symptomatic patients older than 59 were 5.1 times more likely to die from the coronavirus than people between the ages of 30 and 59. Patients younger than 30 were about half as likely to die.What's more, the risk of symptomatic infection increased by about 4% with each year of age among adults between the ages of 30 and 60.
STR/AFP via Getty Images
People between ages 60 and 79 were about twice as susceptible to symptomatic infection as people aged 40 to 49, and about three times more susceptible than people aged 30 to 39.
The difference between the death rate and case-fatality risk
In order to calculate case-fatality risk in Wuhan, the authors first looked at the total numbers of cases and deaths. They reported that as of February 29, there were 48,557 cases and 2,169 deaths in the city.Typically, a virus' death rate (which is not a reflection of the likelihood that a given person will die) is calculated by dividing the number of known deaths by the total number of confirmed cases. A death rate calculation using that data in Wuhan yields a startling figure: 4.5%.
"Indeed, so far, the death-to-case ratio in Wuhan has been consistently much higher than that among all the other mainland Chinese cities," the authors wrote.
But the researchers said that aforementioned data does not reflect the true number of cases in Wuhan, since there are likely more cases than could be officially tested or reported. So the 4.5% calculation is probably too high.Death rates seem to decrease as more people are tested and more mild or asymptomatic cases are confirmed. But testing and confirming those types of cases is challenging "in the setting of an overwhelmed healthcare system that cannot ascertain cases effectively," the authors said.
Between one-quarter and one-half of a population could get infectedThe study authors cautioned that the coronavirus will very likely infect at least one-quarter to one-half of the global population without "drastic control measures or a vaccine."
The fact that people without symptoms can spread the virus - patients who weren't included in this analysis - means the virus is likely to infect a "majority of the population," the authors said."Therefore, the number of severe outcomes or deaths in the population is most strongly dependent on how ill an infected person is likely to become, and this question should be the focus of attention," the authors added.
Xiao Yijiu/Xinhua News Agency via AP
The researchers also said the 1.4% estimate of case-fatality risk may not apply to other places outside of Wuhan - the rates outside of Wuhan could be even lower.
"The precise fatality-risk estimates may not generalize to those outside of that original epicenter, especially during subsequent phases of the epidemic," they wrote. "The increasing availability of newer, and potentially better, treatment modalities to more patients would presumably lead to fewer deaths."Read more:
Featured Digital Health Articles:
- Telehealth Industry: Benefits, Services & Examples
- Value-Based Care Model: Pay-for-Performance Healthcare
- Senior Care & Assisted Living Market Trends
- Smart Medical Devices: Wearable Tech in Healthcare
- AI in Healthcare
- Remote Patient Monitoring Industry: Devices & Market Trends
- Supreme Court challenges India's new rules for governing Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and other OTTs — no 'appropriate action' listed against those who violate regulations
- Netflix's hilarious spoof, Biggest Boss takes a direct dig at competition's hit show, Bigg Boss
- Akali Dal MLAs suspended from Punjab Assembly for remainder of Budget session after ruckus in House. PTI CHS VSD ASH ASH
- Creating value across various departments with innovative technology offerings
- Wipro's share price has outperformed its peers in the last year — but analysts are still cautious about giving it a 'buy' rating