Democratic lawmakers just introduced a bill that would ban the use of facial recognition technology by federal law enforcement
- Democratic lawmakers have introduced a bill that would ban the use of
facial recognition technologyby federal law enforcement, as reported by Vice on Thursday.
- The proposed bill would "prohibit biometric surveillance" unless a federal law is passed with extensive regulations around its use, and makes federal funding for local and state governments contingent on them establishing similar bans.
- Democratic Sens.
Ed Markeyand Jeff Merkeley and Reps. Ayanna Pressley and Pramila Jayapal introduced the bill Thursday.
- Facial recognition has come under increasing scrutiny amid mounting evidence of racial bias, leading some companies to pause sales of their tools to law enforcement and several local governments to enact bans on the technology.
Lawmakers have introduced a bill that would indefinitely prohibit the federal government from using facial recognition technology and other types of "biometric surveillance," Vice reported on Thursday.
The bill would make it illegal for federal agencies to "acquire, possess, access, or use" any technology that collects information about people using biometric data — such as facial features, voice patterns, or their gait — unless a law is passed that includes strict regulations around data collection, sharing, and fairness as well as protections for civil rights.
The bill would also withhold federal "Justice Assistance Grants" — which dole out on average around $435 million per year to law enforcement — from state and local governments who use the technology.
Four Democratic lawmakers — Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey and Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkeley, as well as Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley and Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal — introduced the bill Thursday.
Facial recognition technology, in particular its use by law enforcement, has come under fire in recent weeks amid growing evidence that it discriminates against people based on skin color and gender as well as nationwide protests against police brutality and racism in the criminal justice system.
A sweeping federal study in December found that facial recognition systems were worse at identifying people of color and women than white people and men, confirming existing studies by MIT researchers Joy Buolamwini and Deborah Raji showing bias in
After years of calls from civil rights advocates including the ACLU and Fight for the Future, Amazon,
However, civil rights groups have criticized the moves as not going far enough, and The Wall Street Journal reported that some of the industry's largest players, including NEC, Ayonix, and controversial company Clearview AI have doubled down on their law enforcement business.
Some local governments have also halted the use of facial recognition technology. On Wednesday, Boston's city council voted unanimously to enact a citywide ban, following similar moves by San Francisco as well as five other municipalities in Massachusetts, according to WBUR.
- 'Quiet quitting' is a bad idea, experts say. Here are 6 things you can do instead to get the same results if you're looking for better work-life balance – or to lighten your workload
- Wipro, Infosys, Tech Mahindra revoke offer letters given to freshers: Reports
- Reliance Jio and Airtel 5G prices may be affordable for now but expected to increase after wider rollout
- Redmi Pad Review: A decent tablet for the masses
- Electronics Mart India IPO is subscribed 1.69 times on day 1
- Big B’s best movies are back on the big screens - Here are 11 you can watch
- Reliance Jio to begin beta trial of 5G in four cities on Dussehra with unlimited data
- With 950 billionaires, Asia outnumbers all other regions: Forbes