The US sent an aircraft carrier to 'send a message' to Iran - but it's at a major disadvantage
- President Donald Trump's National Security Adviser John Bolton announced on Sunday that the US would send the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier to send a message from Iran.
- US officials told multiple publications that they found intelligence indicating Iran may soon attack the US.
- Iran has long fantasized about sinking a US aircraft carrier and harassed the US Navy.
- Aircraft carriers are powerful tools, but ill-suited for a fight in Iran's home waters, and would operate at major disadvantages.
- Visit INSIDER's homepage for more stories.
President Donald Trump's National Security Adviser John Bolton announced on Sunday that the US would send the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, and its associated strike group, to the waters near Iran to "send a message" and respond to vague threats.But the US will be sending the powerful carrier to a job it's arguably ill-suited for, putting thousands of sailors at a major military disadvantage and should a conflict come, putting the sinking of a US aircraft carrier in Iran's sights.
While Bolton did not get into specifics, a report from Axios said Israel passed the US "information on an alleged Iranian plot to attack" US forces or interests in the region.The Wall Street Journal cited US officials as saying new intelligence "showed that Iran drew up plans to target U.S. forces in Iraq and possibly Syria, to orchestrate attacks in the Bab el-Mandeb strait near Yemen through proxies and in the Persian Gulf with its own armed drones." Read more: Iran harassed and humiliated the US Navy under Obama - here's why it stopped under Trump
US aircraft carrier strike groups represent the highest order of naval power ever put to sea, but they're not the right tool for every job.
As Caitlin Talmadge, an associate professor of security studies, pointed out on Twitter, US carriers are "designed for operations on the open ocean."As a floating airbase with guided-missile destroyers and cruisers sailing nearby for anti-missile defenses from land and sea, the carriers are best off when moving around far from the range of missiles fired from ashore.
The narrow, "confined waters of the Persian Gulf make carriers tremendously more vulnerable to asymmetric air, land, and naval threats," wrote Talmadge.
Iran's home field advantage could sink a tanker
Aircraft carriers do send a message, and have been relied on for such by presidents for decades, but according to Talmadge, it's kind of empty in this situation.Read more: Iran releases video of its submarine sinking a US aircraft carrier by exploiting a key weakness
In the Gulf wars, or against militants like ISIS, aircraft carriers made plenty of sense."Iraq has tiny coast, couldn't contest US carrier presence, so unusual situation," continued Talmadge, who pointed out that Iran was a different kind of beast. But "Iran's geography & military capabilities, particularly presence of significant assets near Strait of Hormuz, make sailing carrier through Gulf a lot riskier, and w/ less benefit given US ability to deploy carriers in Arabian Sea & Indian Ocean instead," she said.
In fact, the Persian Gulf, Iran's home waters, plays directly into their hands. One of Iran's favorite and best documented ways to harass the US Navy is to use fast attack boats in a swarming attack.
Swarm boat attacks, would "not be much of a danger in the open sea," where the carrier had room to maneuver, but could be a problem in the choked gulf."Iran has various systems that can be a threat within the Persian Gulf, including anti-ship cruise missiles, fast attack craft and swarm boats, mini-submarines, and even asymmetric tactics like UAV swarms that seek to harass rather than disable the carrier," Lamrani continued.
Aircraft carriers lack onboard defenses against torpedoes, something that an old Iranian submarine could manage. In the noisy brown waters of the Persian Gulf, the US Navy may also struggle to track such small boats.Furthermore, Iranian media has fantasized for years about sinking an aircraft carrier. In the country's state-controlled media, the massive ships are often seen as targets ripe for sinking.
With US-Iranian relations hitting a startling new low, the Trump administration's decision to send an aircraft carrier to Tehran's home waters seems a risky choice with little apparent payoff.Accompanying the carrier deployment announced by Bolton was an increase in bombers in the region. As Business Insider reported before, Iran is highly unlikely to attack even small, exposed groups of US troops in the region because the response from nearby US airbases would all but obliterate the country.
- Best pulse oximeters to keep a check on your SpO2 readings
- Poaching doubled during the lockdown in India due to the 'three F's', and these are the animals most under threat
- Android 12 Developer Preview 3: All the upcoming user-facing features revealed
- These are the hottest fintech and crypto jobs in India right now
- There is a virtual lockdown in the world’s fourth largest automobile market