The real reasons we don't have flying cars
- For over a century, engineers and automakers have explored the concept of
- We've seen endless examples and been led to believe they were just around the corner.
- We break down why road-ready aircraft aren't ready for mass production or ride-hailing.
Following is a transcript of the
Narrator: For over a century, people have imagined a future with flying
For engineers, flying cars have two opposite sets of requirements. Aircraft need to be light and narrow in order to be aerodynamic and generate lift. Cars, on the other hand, have to be wide and heavy enough to stay centered on the road and generate downforce. And while parts like side-view mirrors are necessary on the ground, in the air, they create unneeded drag. This reduces range and requires more fuel to fly. It can also cause instability. Meanwhile, wings and rotor blades can throw off a car's power-to-weight ratio. The heavier they are, the bigger a powertrain you'll need to drive. But too heavy a powertrain, and the car won't fly. Vice versa, if the wings are too small, the car won't get off the ground.
Developing a vehicle that meets this balance is expensive and time consuming. That's because, unlike with cars and planes, there is no blueprint for flying cars. Slovakian company
The first was simply a concept designed by cofounder Stefan Klein in the 1990s. It could theoretically fly and drive, but was bizarre-looking and far too big to be used in traffic. This led to the second version, which was built in 2010 when the company was established. It had collapsible wings, could fit into a regular parking space, and had a range of 545 miles on the road and 435 miles in the air. It first flew in 2013.
But even then, the company was already in development of its first official prototype, the AeroMobil 3.0. It featured upgrades that would be necessary on a production car. That includes a reinforced body made from carbon fiber, advanced avionics, and patented steering controls. It could transform from a car to flight mode in under three minutes. Despite these advancements, the 3.0 crash-landed during its 2015 test flight. Test pilot Klein lost control, and the vehicle went into a tailspin. Photos showed that the vehicle's steel framework was destroyed. If the company wanted to sell this car to the public, it would need to be much safer.
So they returned with a model almost 800 pounds heavier and a monocoque structure stronger than its predecessor. It also included an upgraded parachute system and dual-stage airbags. This newest prototype took five years, cost over $20 million, and required 10,000 hours of test flights for the company to be confident it was ready. After three decades of research and development, AeroMobil is awaiting government certification. The vehicle will cost at least $1.3 million and require a pilot's license. That's a pretty steep buy-in, and at that price, it's unlikely you will see vehicles like these in mass anytime soon.
To integrate flying cars into our daily routine, we have to rethink our approach to them entirely, which is exactly what companies like
Although their engineering is similar to existing military aircraft, some modifications are necessary to operate in crowded urban areas -- like electrification. Besides eliminating fuel emissions, electric powertrains have less complicated mechanics than jet-powered models. But that doesn't mean eVTOLs are easy to produce. They'll need to use distributed electric propulsion, meaning they'll have a redundant number of rotors and motors. Unlike a helicopter or a plane, if one rotor fails, the other will keep the aircraft flying. This is necessary when hundreds of them will be flying around crowded areas.
This type of propulsion would also contribute to quieter flight. While helicopters use large rotors to generate maximum lift and prevent stalling, the small rotors used by eVTOLs would be mounted on wings and capable of tilting forward like a plane's propeller. This would allow them to spin much slower. This setup, along with the electric motors, could make eVTOLs at least five times quieter than helicopters.
EVTOLs seem like the simplest solution, but they require an entirely new infrastructure to function. Projects like Uber and
EVTOLs need to digitally communicate with each other and nearby air towers. At the moment, all of this has to be done verbally, which is efficient and safe with only a few aircraft, not a mass fleet. Available at a limited capacity for commercial drones, digital communication allows aircraft to instantly share their flight-plan data. For air taxis to be sustainable, this limited capacity will need to expand.
While the technology exists for both these types of vehicles, it's the logistics preventing them from being a reality. Between certification and the infrastructure they'll need to function in our current world, it'll be a long time before flying cars are a routine way to travel.
- Adani Power undertakes green ammonia combustion pilot project at Mundra plant
- Gautam Adani re-enters the top 20 richest club after stock rally
- Good morning Mr Robot: Seoul school to get new-age English tutors
- Vikrant Massey's 12th Fail crosses ₹50 crore-mark at box office
- Virat Kohli to take a break from white-ball games on South Africa tour; to be available for Tests: Report