There's something odd about the way insulin prices change
as much on monthly diabetes-related expenses as their mortgage payment.
But what makes the rise in insulin prices different than many other old drugs that have drawn scrutiny over prices, is that there is competition for insulin.In most industries, competition drives down prices. In this case, the competitors appear to increase prices side-by-side - something that's been referred to as "shadow pricing."
Despite this competition, prices have steadily climbed over the past decade, taking single or double-digit list price increases in a year. A 10 ml vial of Sanofi's long-acting insulin Lantus first hit the US market at $34.81 a vial in 2001, according to data from Truven Health Analytics.Since 2014, the last time Sanofi raised the price, it has been $248.51.
During the period in which Lantus's price rose 600%, a rival product from Novo Nordisk appeared. In 2006, the new drug, called Levemir, hit the market at $66.96 (close to what Sanofi's drug cost at the time). These days Levemir costs about $269.In other words, the competition seems to have done nothing to push prices down. In fact, when charted side by side, the price increases seem to be in synch.
Andy Kiersz/Business Insider
When you look at short-acting analog insulins (the types of insulin that are taken around the time diabetics eat, or what's used in a insulin pump), the prices are in such lockstep that you can't see 2 lines.
Lilly's Humalog cost $20.82 in 1996 and now goes for $255.40, an increase of 1,124% over 20 years. Novo Nordisks's Novolog first hit the market in August 2001 at $39.75, and as of July 2016, a vial comes with a list price of $255.40 - exactly the same as Humalog.
Andy Kiersz/Business Insider
When asked about this timing, a spokesman for Novo Nordisk told Business Insider via email that this has to do with how the companies keep tabs on one another.
"It is possible to see price changes through a variety of databases, and we have always monitored the market closely, just as other companies do," he said. Sanofi's spokeswoman said that the company sets the prices of its medications independently, and a spokesman for Lilly noted that the companies are all dealing with the same parts of the healthcare system: the pharmacy benefits managers, the health insurers, etc. that affect pricing decisions.
Even if it seems odd that prices would rise like this in a competitive market, it highlights the hold that drug brands have over doctors who prescribe medicines, and the patients who pay for them.
Bloomberg's Robert Langreth explored the issue last year, and spoke to a pharmacist and economist who said that it is proof that branded prescription drugs "are basically not a competitive market," when it comes to prices. This isn't unique to insulin: When there was a viable competitor for EpiPen something similar happened, and with multiple-sclerosis drugs.As for why the price has gone up so much, regardless of the similarities? The companies offer a number of explanations - including that rebates and other offsets mean that the income to the company is actually declining, and or that they're spending billions to produce and package insulin - making improvements in how the drug is delivered and produced.
For more about insulin, and the people who depend on it, check out our piece on the rising cost of diabetes care.
- The decision not to have a kid is personal — but the social pressure against the choice is all-pervasive
- K'taka budget will focus on welfare of women & their development: CM
- Global consumer spending on apps to reach $270 billion annually by 2025
- Farmers announce series of Mahapanchayats in March
- Huawei aims to make electric cars later this year