'They would have no choice': Kamala Harris says her administration's DOJ would bring criminal charges against Trump

- Kamala Harris said in a recent interview with NPR that the Department of Justice under her hypothetical administration "would have no choice" but to bring criminal charges for obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump.
- "I believe there should be accountability. Everyone should be held accountable, and the president is not above the law," Harris explained.
- In a surprise May 29 press conference at the DOJ, Mueller announced his formal resignation and re-iterated the report's conclusions, saying, "if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
- Harris' comments come as a fervor for impeaching Trump is brewing among House Democrats, with 60 members on the record as supporting an impeachment inquiry against Trump.
- While Harris' call to indict Trump may energize voters who want to see legal action taken against the president, some commentators said Harris' remarks were "inappropriate."
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
California senator and presidential candidate Kamala Harris said in a recent interview with NPR that the Department of Justice under her hypothetical administration "would have no choice" but to bring criminal charges for obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump.
"I mean look, people might, you know, question why I became a prosecutor. Well, I'll tell you one of the reasons - I believe there should be accountability. Everyone should be held accountable, and the president is not above the law," Harris, who previously served as California's attorney general and the district attorney for San Francisco, explained to NPR.
On April 18, the Department of Justice released a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report from his nearly two-year-long investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether Trump obstructed justice.On the issue of obstruction, the Mueller report said that, in many cases, Trump failed in his efforts to impede the Mueller probe and other federal investigations because his own aides chose not to follow through with his requests.
The Mueller report listed 11 separate instances the special counsel examined for possible obstruction by Trump. Those include his firing of FBI Director James Comey in May 2017, his attempts to fire Mueller himself, who was appointed after Comey's dismissal, and signaling that he would be open to pardoning former aides Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen.
The report said, however, that the office could not come to a "traditional prosecutorial decision" as to whether Trump obstructed justice, citing "difficult issues of law in fact," citing prevailing DOJ policy which advises that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
Harris' comments come as a fervor for impeaching Trump is surging among House Democrats. While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is approaching the topic of impeachment with caution, 60 members of her caucus have gone on the record as supporting an impeachment inquiry
The push for impeachment has only intensified as the Trump administration ramped up its stonewalling of Congress' attempts to investigate Trump since the report's release, including ordering former White House aides like Hope Hicks, former White House counsel Don McGahn, and his chief of staff Annie Donaldson not to comply with congressional subpoenas.Read more: Here are all the congressional Democrats and 2020 presidential candidates who want to impeach Trump
In a surprise May 29 press conference at the DOJ, Mueller announced his formal resignation and re-iterated the report's conclusions, saying, "if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
Harris told NPR that "we should believe Bob Mueller when he tells us essentially that the only reason an indictment was not returned is because of a memo in the Department of Justice that suggests you cannot indict a sitting president, adding that she'd seen "prosecution of cases on much less evidence."
While Harris' call to indict Trump may energize Democrats who want to see legal action taken against the president, some commentators said Harris' remarks were "inappropriate."
'If candidates are committed to rebuilding the independence of the Justice Department, this is not the road to go down," Lawfare editor Quinta Jurecic wrote on Twitter, adding, "no one in a democracy should be running on a promise to prosecute a political opponent."
Read more:
Nancy Pelosi says most Americans don't understand what impeachment means: 'They think that if you get impeached, you're gone.'
A group of self-proclaimed NBC staffers are trying to dissuade colleagues from unionizing with an Instagram page that spreads messages like 'dues are for the gym'

Uber safety report reveals over 3,000 sexual assaults in US rides in 2018

Russian secret agents have reportedly been operating out of villages in the French Alps

An experiment that solved a 100-year-old mystery posed by Einstein just got up to 50% more powerful by squeezing light

What Type Of audit Report Can CAG Generate In India
Raghuram Rajan's warning about Mudra loans last year may be coming true
Microsoft’s four-day work week idea will be good for Indians— but there is a lot to be fixed before that
Dues, death and an investigation — all that went wrong with OYO hotels in the last 6 months
Three wise men who exited Vodafone India just in time to make millions
SAIF Partners invested in Swiggy when they just had a landing page – today they are going after more seed stage startups, here’s why
Here's why North Korean hackers attacked India's nuclear power plant
Not just Tata Motors, a lot of other companies are excited by Jaguar Land Rover numbers
Surprise, surprise – Indians want censorship for Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hotstar
SIGN IN WITH
FacebookGoogleEmail