This insane chart shows how violence has spiked - and declined - since 1400
The good news is: we're killing each other less.
The bad news is: we've been killing each other in armed conflict for a long, long time.
You can see those trends in this new graph from Oxford economist Max Roser:
Max Roser / Creative Commons
The chart, which recently made it to the front of the Data is Beautiful subreddit, comes with a few takeaways:
The first half of the 20th century was rough. During World War I, about 90 per 100,000 people died in battle. In World War II, that number spiked to 200 people for every 100,000.
The 17th century was brutal. About 150 of 100,000 died during the 30 Years' War that dominated central Europe from 1618 to 1648.
It's way better now. In 2000, about 2 in every 100,000 died in armed conflict. Interestingly, that's a very similar to figure to all the way back in 1400.
A note on methodology: The chart uses a logarithmic scale, which is useful when showing data that covers a huge range of values. The vertical axis increases by powers of ten, rather than a constant linear unit.
- No crypto ban in India — SEBI will reportedly be pulled in to regulate the sector
- I tried a calendar that's meant to boost productivity by mapping out the number of weeks you have left to live — here's how it went
- I wore the same outfit for a week, as part of a productivity hack promoted by Steve Jobs — but it didn't really work. After speaking to psychologists, I'm not surprised.
- 44 key areas, a national framework, and a multi-institutional approach — Here's what you need to know about India's new National Blockchain Strategy
- India's biggest test wins since 2018 — Virat Kohli was not the captain in two of those 14 matches
- Samsung launches Galaxy A03 Core with 6.5-inch display, 5,000 mAh battery, starting at ₹7,999
- Nifty 50 goes below 17,000-mark on rising Omicron cases, fear of lockdown
- Indian government is reportedly looking to regulate work from home with a comprehensive framework