Uber is paying at least $10 million for making misleading safety claims
The San Francisco-headquartered company was sued in 2014 after it claimed its driver vetting system was better than than the systems used by traditional mini cab companies. Uber proudly advertised that it was the "the gold standard" in the industry when it came to safety.
But district attorneys in San Francisco and Los Angeles said on Thursday that Uber's message was misleading.
Unlike traditional cab companies, Uber does not take fingerprints for would-be drivers. Instead, it relies on criminal databases that only go back seven years.
Uber said in a statement: "Accidents and incidents do happen. That's why we need to ensure that the language used to describe safety at Uber is clear and precise. We've agreed not to use terms like 'safest ride on the road' or describe our background checks as 'the gold standard.'"
The prosecutors highlighted that Uber failed to prevent 25 convicted criminals - including several sex offenders and a convicted murderer - from becoming drivers on its platform, according to the BBC.
The company added that "no means of transportation can be 100% safe."
Uber has no plans to make its drivers undergo fingerprint checks, according to the BBC.
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- Saudi Arabia wants China to help fund its struggling $500 billion Neom megaproject. Investors may not be too excited.
- One of the world's only 5-star airlines seems to be considering asking business-class passengers to bring their own cutlery
- From terrace to table: 8 Edible plants you can grow in your home
- India fourth largest military spender globally in 2023: SIPRI report
- New study forecasts high chance of record-breaking heat and humidity in India in the coming months
- Gold plunges ₹1,450 to ₹72,200, silver prices dive by ₹2,300
- Strong domestic demand supporting India's growth: Morgan Stanley