Angus Deaton and lessons for India
Advertisement

Advertisement
Prof. Deaton work has been driven by understanding measurement and relies extensively on data for making sense of individual consumption choices. He has also worked in India for understanding poverty as well as it impacts on
The most important message that Prof. Deaton also mentioned in a recent interview was that there seems to be a statistical discrepancy in the data for India. It is because the household survey results do not reconcile with the fact that there seems to be an exceptional increase in income data coming from the national accounts. It seems to be a very valid contention since increases in income should lead to increases in consumption. The household data does not seem to have commensurate increases that one sees in the national accounts. In our experience even within the national accounts there seems to be a problem as the individual 'state growth rates' far exceed the growth rate for the country as a whole. It becomes particularly problematic as no government (either state or union government) would want a downward revision of GDP estimates. An independent inquiry is a must to understand these statistical discrepancies and make statistical systems more robust so that one can understand and track real changes better.
Second, the role of public services is very important be it roads, healthcare, education, or
Third, poverty is fundamentally about the lack of choices and it is important to know that it has gone down in India as well as in the world. By how much is relatively difficult to say in the Indian context due to data discrepancies but it has gone down. Another related issue with poverty is inequality. In itself inequality is not inherently bad but bad when people who become rich 'burn down' the pathways for others to become rich. In a recent Credit Suisse report, it was pointed out that the top 1 percent of Indians own 53 percent of India's wealth. While the statistic looks stark that this wealth can be taxed and used for providing better public services to the poor shows that inequality in itself is not bad. The fact that that inequality is not being leveraged for the public good is bad.
Advertisement
(The article is co-authored with Sankalp Sharma, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Competitiveness, India. Amit Kapoor is Chair, Institute for Competitiveness & Editor of Thinkers. The views expressed are personal. Amit can be reached at amit.kapoor@competitiveness.in and tweets @kautiliya)
Image credit: Economic Times
Advertisement
Family stands to lose nearly $6,000 in airfare and hotel costs after they were bumped from an overbooked cruise ship
A Trump spokeswoman mocked Pete Buttigieg's military service in a Memorial Day weekend spat with Ron DeSantis
Flyers are 'skiplagging' to try and save money on flight tickets. Airlines hate it.
With inflation cooling, RBI may slash interest rates by 50 bps this financial year
ULIPs are not for senior citizens: Here’s how to choose the right investments to secure the golden years of your life
Ambati Rayudu announces retirement from IPL
Data protection bill to drive deep behavioural changes for platforms exploiting data: Chandrasekhar
MS Dhoni set to play 250th IPL match of his career