JPMorgan takes Tesla to court over Elon Musk’s 2018 tweets — demands $162 million
JPMorganhas filed a lawsuit against Tesla over breach of contract.
- The bank has claimed that the automaker owes it over $162 million.
- The issue began when
Elon Musktweeted in August 2018 that he was taking the company private.
AdvertisementJPMorgan Chase & Co has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk-led electric car maker Tesla for $162 million. The American investment bank has accused Tesla of “flagrantly” breaching a contract related to stock warrants because Musk’s tweets triggered a rally in the share price.
According to a Reuters report, the complaint has been filed at the Manhattan federal court.
As per the complaint, Tesla had sold stock warrants to JPMorgan in 2014 and it was required to deliver shares or pay cash to the investment bank if its share price went above the contractually set “strike price” upon their expiry in June and July 2021.
Musk’s “going private” tweet triggers strike price reduction
The investment bank further said that it had the authority to adjust the strike price and it was reduced substantially following Musk’s tweet on August 7, 2018 that he might take Tesla private at $420 per share and he had secured the funding to do so.
Musk had abandoned the idea soon after and announced that the company will remain public, after which, JPMorgan reversed some of the reduction in the strike price.
Tesla’s share price increased by almost 10 times by the time the warrants expired in June and July 2021. JPMorgan claimed that this required Tesla to deliver either the shares of its stock or cash and the company’s failure to do so amounts to a default.
While the companies had agreed to an original strike price of $560.6388, it was reduced to $424.66 after Musk’s tweet. After the company announced it would remain public, the strike price was increased to $484.35 and Tesla was informed about the new strike price.
Tesla stops talking to JPMorgan
As per the lawsuit, Tesla “protested that no adjustment should be necessary at all because it had so quickly abandoned its going-private plans,”. After several conference calls and the bank explaining its calculations, Tesla “did not provide any specific objection” to these explanations.
AdvertisementJPMorgan added that Tesla stopped talking to the investment bank for six months after the conference calls.
In February 2019, Tesla’s lawyers sent a letter to the investment bank alleging that the strike price adjustments were “unreasonably swift and represented an opportunistic attempt to take advantage of changes in volatility in Tesla’s stock.” The bank responded by rejecting all the allegations and the two sides stopped talking for two years.
Another adjustment was made to the strike price in August 2020 to account for Tesla’s stock split, bringing it down to $96.87. However, Tesla once again did not respond to this adjustment.
When the warrants neared expiry, Tesla’s share price was well above the strike price. After JPMorgan contacted Tesla to cash out, the automaker “renewed its objections to the Adjustments.”
While the company ended up settling some shares with the bank, “refused to settle in full,” triggering an “early termination” clause.
AdvertisementAs per the bank, Tesla owed 2,28,775 shares when the contract was terminated and these shares are worth over $162 million.
The UN responded to Elon Musk's challenge to prove how his wealth could tackle world hunger by revealing a $6.6 billion plan
Elon Musk initiates another Twitter fight by squabbling with Bernie Sanders over extreme wealth
Inspired by Elon Musk, investors are incorporating meme numerology into their bitcoin trading strategies
Popular on BI
- Richest entrepreneurs under 40 named in the IIFL Wealth Hurun list became more richer by 12% in last one year
- Time taken to deliver items & returns are the key pain points for e-comm consumers
- DGCI allows Serum Institute to export malaria vaccine to UK
- Upcoming cars launching in India in October 2022
- Gurgaon-based Indifi disbursed ₹2,800 crore worth of loans to small business owners