Paytm IPO: Former One 97 Communication director urges SEBI to stall the public issue

Advertisement
Paytm IPO: Former One 97 Communication director urges SEBI to stall the public issue
One97 Communication Vijay Shekhar SharmaBCCL
    Advertisement
    • Ashok Kumar Saxena, who served as a director in One 97 Communication between 2000-2004, alleged that he had invested in the company for a 55% shareholding.
    • Paytm in its submission to police confirmed that such a ‘letter of intent’ was signed, but it never materialised into a ‘definitive agreement’ as Saxena ‘lost interest’.
    • The digital payments giant has also reportedly claimed that allegations against Paytm are attempts to harass the company.
    Ashok Kumar Saxena, a former director in Paytm’s parent company One 97 Communications, is now urging India’s market regulator to stall the digital payments giant’s $2.2 billion initial public offering (IPO).

    Saxena alleges that he is the co-founder of One 97 Communications and had invested about $27,500 in the company about two decades ago. However, the company never transferred his 55% shareholdings to him, as per Saxena.

    At the centre of the argument is a one-page document signed by Saxena and Paytm founder and chief executive Vijay Shekhar Sharma in 2001. The document reportedly highlights that Saxena would get a 55% equity stake in Paytm's parent company One 97 Communications. The remaining 45% equity shares would be owned by Sharma.

    As per a media report, the former director of the company had reached out to market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). According to a media report, Saxena had also reached out to Delhi police to file a complaint against the company, but no case was registered.

    However, Saxena has now reportedly approached a New Delhi court, urging the judge to direct the local police to register a case on his complaint. The court had ordered the police to respond and the matter will be heard on August 23, as per the media report. Business Insider was not able to reach out to Saxena immediately.

    Advertisement

    The development was first reported by Reuters.

    Paytm, in a legal document submitted to the Delhi Police, claimed Saxena's allegations against Paytm are attempts to harass the company, as per the Reuters report.

    The company has listed the dispute under 'criminal proceedings' in its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) for its IPO.


    Paytm in the documentation submitted to the Delhi Police, has reportedly agreed that Saxena was one of the first few directors in the company who served between 2000 and 2004. However, a company source has denied that Saxena was the co-founder of One 97 Communications. The document was accessed by Reuters.

    Business Insider has reached out to Paytm seeking comments. We will be updating the copy if and when we receive a response.
    Advertisement

    The digital payments giant states that Saxena did extend funds to the company, however, he gradually “lost interest”. The company also emphasised that the letter being referred above was merely a “letter of Intent” and not a formal agreement. Paytm has also mentioned this in its legal statement to the police.

    Saxena had started disassociating himself from the company after the document was signed and stopped attending board meetings, Paytm said in the legal statement. Therefore, the intent never reached a full agreement.

    Paytm in the legal document also stated that Paytm and Saxena had reached a private understanding and transferred the shares to an Indian firm. Saxena said he had never received any shares and there was no misunderstanding.

    "The shares and money are one thing, but I also want to be recognised as the co-founder," Saxena told Reuters.
    SEE ALSO
    Travel app ixigo files for a ₹1,600 crore IPO
    Swiggy reports nearly three-fold increase in annual revenue, in neck and neck race with Zomato
    Advertisement
    Lenskart aims to hire over 2000 employees to ramp up its operations
    {{}}