Has the legal battle between PhonePe and BharatPe over ‘Pe’ been going on for too long?
- PhonePe claims that ‘Pe’ is a distinctive part of their name and BharatPe’s usage of the term is an infringement.
- PhonePe has three lawsuits against BharatPe over this issue in the Delhi as well as Bombay High Courts.
- Recently, the Bombay High Court rejected its claim saying PhonePe does not have a separate registration for ‘Pe’.
The issue gained prominence after BharatPe launched its ‘buy now pay later’ offering PostPe a month back.
PhonePe believes that ‘PostPe’ has a striking resemblance to their brand name and decided to take the legal route in the first place.
AdvertisementThe company in its plea also claimed that the word ‘Phone’ is not a “unique” or “distinctive” part of its name, the word ‘Pe’ is. Therefore, BharatPe’s use of the word ‘Pe’ is an infringement.
Walmart-owned PhonePe approached the Bombay high court to sort out this issue. However, the Bombay high court — in a court order dated October 22 — noted that PhonePe cannot claim exclusivity over the ‘Pe’ suffix as they don’t have a separate registration for it.
PhonePe decided to withdraw the injunction post the order to address certain observations made by the court.
BharatPe then said that by withdrawing the suit, PhonePe has given up its claim for exclusivity over ‘Pe’. However, PhonePe mentioned they intend to file a follow up suit regarding the same.
Now in its plea to the Delhi high court, BharatPe has sought scrapping of multiple registrations held by PhonePe over the ‘Pe’ device mark in the Devanagari script.
“By taking on a trademark for the “Pe” device mark in Devanagari Script in classes relating to payment services in a country like India, where Hindi is the primary language of the masses, PhonePe has acted against the larger public interest, and Resilient [BharatPe’s registered name] is committed to undoing this,” BharatPe’s spokesperson said.
AdvertisementThis is not the first fight over the ‘Pe’ suffix
|2018||PhonePe sends a legal notice to BharatPe||BharatPe changes logo and colour scheme|
|2019||PhonePe approaches Delhi High Court||Delhi High Court rejects the plea in April 2021|
|2021||BharatPe launches PostPe||PhonePe files injunction plea in Bombay High Court claiming exclusivity over ‘Pe’|
|October 2021||Bombay High Court rejects the plea||BharatPe files lawsuit in Delhi High Court, seeking cancellation of PhonePe’s trademark|
Previously, PhonePe had filed an injunction plea in the Delhi high court over ‘Pe’ in BharatPe in May 2019. In the matter — heard by a single bench of Justice C Hari Shankar — PhonePe reiterated that ‘Pe’ gives the company name distinctiveness and users are able to associate the said word with their brand name.
The company also said that the colour scheme and font of BharatPe’s logo also had similarities to PhonePe’s.
However, the Delhi high court too rejected their claim in April this year, citing insufficient evidence. “The evidence presently at hand is insufficient to come to a definitive conclusion that the “Pe” suffix would, in the public consciousness, indelibly be associated with the plaintiff’s services,” Justice Shankar said.
The issue between the two companies has been going on since 2018, after the launch of BharatPe.
PhonePe had sent its first legal notice to BharatPe in August 2018 over the removal of the suffix in question. In response, BharatPe changed its logo and colour scheme.
Axis Bank, Bajaj Finance, Maruti Suzuki and other hot stocks on October 27 as earnings season gathers momentum
Bitcoin price dips to $60,000 as the crypto market corrects
A toilet tube on SpaceX's Crew Dragon spaceship broke and sprayed pee under the floor during its first tourist flight
Popular on BI
- From marketing and tech to leadership - learn new skills and explore new possibilities with these Udemy courses
- Facebook and Microsoft aren’t the only ones creating a metaverse — here are five popular coins looking to create digital worlds
- Facebook, Microsoft and others look towards the $1 trillion dollar ‘metaverse’ opportunity — but that contradicts the base philosophy behind Web 3.0
- Jio tariff hike and reports of bid for UK telco British Telecom help Reliance bounce back
- Valorant Mobile: Gameplay, release date and what to expect
- Cryptocurrency mining is causing power shutdowns in Kazakhstan, and China may be to blame
- Chip shortages to blame for Black Friday online sales dip
- Global COVID-19 caseload crosses 261 million and 5 million deaths so far