Insider trading, IP theft, fake art and fake profiles — Scammers are taking advantage of NFT platforms’ lack of regulation
- The world’s largest platform selling non-fungible tokens (NFTs),
OpenSea, admitted to one of its employees committing insider tradingafter accusations came to light on Twitter.
- Artist Tyler Hobbs, the brains behind the Fidenza
NFTseries, has accused SolBlocks of copying his work without giving him credit.
- And, just last month a
fake NFTclaiming to be artwork by graffiti artist Banksywas sold for $336,000.
- These instances highlight how NFT platforms allow artists to list their NFTs without as many checks and balances as in the real world — a gaping hole in regulation that needs to be fixed.
The most recent incident is of the world’s largest NFT marketplace, Open Sea, which does over $100 million in trading volumes, admitting to insider trading. One of its senior employees used privileged information to buy NFTs that would be displayed prominently on its platform.
“This is incredibly disappointing. We want to be clear that this behavior does not represent our values as a team.”
However, the OpenSea case isn’t the first time an instance of fraud has been seen on the NFT space. Tyler Hobbs, an artist who designed the popular NFT series called
This is 100% NOT me. I thought the point of NFT was that the artwork and artists needed to be verified? Apparently… https://t.co/ndkUs9y2K4— Derek Laufman (@laufman) 1615639046000
It doesn’t get more mainstream than insider trading
Nate Chastain, who was OpenSea’s head of product, was accused by Twitter users of using secret Ethereum wallets to buy NFTs on the platform before they were listed for the public. OpenSea — worth $1.5 billion — did not name the employee in their acknowledgement, but did admit to the fact the insider trading had taken place.
Hey @opensea why does it appear @natechastain has a few secret wallets that appears to buy your front page drops be… https://t.co/7riFTm1MM2— Zuwu (@ZuwuTV) 1631662119000
According to 8BTCNews, a Chinese blockchain news outlet, Chastain and his scheme clocked in a profit of 18.875 Ether — worth around $68,000 as per the price of Ether on September 16 at 2:00 pm Indian Standard Time (IST).
To the platform’s credit, which hit new highs in August after docking transaction volumes worth $3.4 billion, it responded and admitted the theft in less than 24 hours. It has decided to implement two new employee policies, including one which forbids team members from buying and selling NFs while they are being promoted by the company.
“We are taking this very seriously and are conducting an immediate and thorough third party review of this incident so that we have a full understanding of the facts and additional steps we need to take.”
The Fidenza episode
Hobbs, the ‘artist who paints with code’, wasn’t happy to find out that his code was being used to create art on SolBlocks, without giving him any credit.
While SolBlocks admitted to copying the code — which is essentially the core IP of the artist’s work. — the company maintains that the NFTs in question are not copies of his Fidenza collection,which consists of 999 unique pieces. One of the NFTs sold in August for a whopping $3.3 million.
3/ Each and every SolBlocks Series I (Fidenza) is a completely new, unique, algorithmically-generated piece of art… https://t.co/oupq6UShF1— SolBlocks (@Sol_blocks) 1631663329000
The incident shows yet another way in which fraud can happen via NFTs. Creators have often appreciated the fact that NFTs allow them to earn commissions on future sales, but if the core code is stolen, it also would leave them vulnerable.
While the crypto and blockchain industry promises security and accountability, there have also been cases of fake NFTs being sold. Pranksky followed a link someone shared on chat platform Discord and bought an NFT that seemed to be officially posted by the anonymous street artist himself — but was a fake.
BBC reported that the hacker returned the $336,000 to Pranksky eventually, but the collector still lost the $5000 he paid in transaction fees.
Traditional auction houses and systems have verification systems for high profile sales, while trading platforms usually have rules to avoid insider trading. For instance, a piece of physical art sold through Sotheby’s has to go through a series of verifications to verify its authenticity.
On the other hand, many blockchain platforms allow almost anyone to mint their own NFTs on their platforms. The idea being that only those who create quality content will make money. But in the rush to increase volumes, such instances can happen.
To be clear, such regulations are being worked on too. The Indian government is looking to include NFTs in its upcoming crypto bill, while the European Union has also looked to regulate these marketplaces.
For a more in-depth discussion, come on over to Business Insider Cryptosphere — a forum where users can deep dive into all things crypto, engage in interesting discussions and stay ahead of the curve.
From CryptoPunks to trading pets on the blockchain -- how well do you know your NFTs? Take this quiz to find out
Solana continues to plummet as Bitcoin, Ethereum and others rise with the market
Bitcoin mining isn't just consuming energy, it's also generating 272 grams of e-waste with every transaction
- 'Harry Potter' had a chance to represent Indian kids like me, but all we got were Parvati and Padma Patil's atrocious Yule Ball outfits
- Manchester United owners are getting drawn to the world's biggest cricket league – here's why
- Elon Musk sparks another Shiba Inu rally ‘to the moon’ — other Shiba coins follow suit
- IPL teams are reportedly launching fan tokens, which will give followers a bigger say in club decisions
- Google now wants to teach you a new word daily with this new feature
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 review – foldable phones are ready for the mainstream
- COVID-19 pandemic killed 80,000-180,000 health workers till May 2021, says WHO
- Dutch investigators hack Tesla's driving storage system, finds more data than previously known