The three dimensions of investing today are risk, return, and impact. Experts say investors concerned about ESG need to 'do their homework'
- When it comes to data on sustainable investing, asking the right questions is key.
- Execs from
Bridgewaterand LGIMoutlined policies that could encourage better ESGdisclosure.
- The conversation was part of Insider's virtual event, "Future of Finance," presented by Grayscale on June 8, 2021.
As financial institutions grapple with the steep risks posed by the imminent global climate crisis, ESG (environmental, social, and governance) investing has emerged as a potential solution. While these sustainable investment strategies have gained popularity with investors, data and reporting surrounding ESG factors can be opaque and confusing.Karen Karniol-Tambour, co-chief investment officer for
Karniol-Tambour said that the key question for Bridgewater in evaluating ESG investments is what they are trying to get out of the data."Don't think about what is presented to you, but [think about] what concept are you actually trying to capture," Karniol-Tambour said.
Hoeppner said in analyzing sustainable investments, LGIM is trying to "create [its] own points of view and rely less on others."The firm has two key goals in mind when it looks to
"For example, if we're going and deciding whether or not we think the price of copper is going to go up or down, you really just can't do that analysis without looking at what's the pace going to be in which it will transition away from carbon," Karniol-Tambour said.
"Investing is not two-dimensional risk and return. It's actually three-dimensional risk, return, and impact -or risk, return, and sustainability. And that third dimension, deserves just as much care, attention, analysis, customization."Multiple strategies are available to investors seeking to maximize impact. Hoeppner said that divestment, or opting out of investing in certain assets because they are not sustainable, is "overused" as a strategy. He said that LGIM, as a major investor in many public companies, prefers to use its access to have "constructive engagements" with their portfolio companies through discussions and proxy votes on how to navigate risk.
Moderator Bradley Saacks asked the panelists about the regulatory environment for ESG investing. Hoeppner mentioned that in the US today, if you are participating in a 401k or pension as part of your corporation, it is legally unclear whether or not you can have a sustainability fund in your lineup.
He said he is optimistic that regulators will sort out the issue, which he attributed to an "incorrect assumption" that ESG strategies were deployed for non-financial benefits, whereas he believes most ESG research is actually performed with the goal of reaping financial benefits.He also expressed the hope that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces some sort of mandatory disclosure for climate risk for all companies, arguing that information is the basis for a free market.
Without disclosures and data, Hoeppner said, it is difficult to discern companies' credibility on ESG issues."All investment managers see ESG and sustainable investing as a commercial opportunity," Hoeppner said.
"How do you tell one asset manager from another one when everyone says that they have the best sustainability credentials? The hard answer is that you have to do your homework."
- Here’s how to recharge your Reliance Jio on WhatsApp
- India may classify Bitcoin as an asset class, but that may not solve the underlying problem
- Facebook rolls out new chat themes and payment options in Messenger app for US users
- Dodla Dairy's ₹520 crore IPO isn't to expand into new markets but to strengthen its foothold where it already exists
- Sun TV Network's advertising revenue shrinks, but profit jumps 11% on subscriptions