Retail sales in China dropped by 20.5% after coronavirus hit, illustrating a scary difference between today's crisis and 2008
- Retail sales in China declined by 20.5% this year, after the coronavirus prevented people from shopping.
- That stat gives us a glimpse of why this crisis is potentially more terrifying than the recession of 2008.
- In 2008, the crisis was financial, and government and central banks have good tools for fixing that.
- The coronavirus crisis, however, is a crisis of work. It strips hundreds of millions of workers out of the global economy. There is no fix for that.
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
The US Federal Reserve cut interest rates to near zero on Sunday night, an unscheduled move designed to show that the Fed is serious about providing cheap money as the coronavirus crisis hurts the global economy.
Unfortunately, the markets did not find the extra liquidity reassuring. They reacted badly, seeing it as a confirmation of the level of desperation among governments. In early trading, European equities plunged:
- Britain's FTSE 100 was down 5.8% in early trading.
- The Euro Stoxx 50 collapsed 8.5%.
But it is new data of out China this morning that ought to truly terrify governments: Retail sales there have declined by 20.5% this year, according to a note from Pantheon Macroeconomics published this morning.
That is jarring because China retail sales growth is almost always positive and has been for years.
In fact, the 20.5% stat isn't the full picture: "We think sales in February must have roughly halved compared with last year, with a m/m drop of around the same amount, assuming that January sales were flat m/m, and the bulk of the hit came in February," Chief Asia Economist Freya Beamish told her clients.
We haven't seen numbers like that since the great financial crisis of 2008.
Taken together, the two events - China's sales decline and the markets tanking on the Fed rate change - give us a glimpse of why this crisis is potentially more terrifying than 2008.
- In 2008, the crisis was a crisis of the financial system, and government and central banks have good tools for fixing that.
- The coronavirus crisis, however, is a crisis of work. It literally strips hundreds of millions of workers out of the global economy.
There is no fix for a work crisis. Central bank liquidity is especially not a fix for that.
'The demand for air travel is essentially non-existent'
Back in 2008, the Fed also lowered interest rates to near zero. The logic was that the central bank was battling a freeze on the availability of money. The freeze occurred because banks became afraid to lend money, either to each or to investors and consumers.
By lowering the rate, the Fed - and the ECB, and the Bank of England - were all saying, "Don't worry, there is a lot of cheap new money available." That was probably the right move, given that they were battling a systemic crisis inside the global financial system.
The coronavirus crisis, however, has nothing to do with liquidity or credit. It is caused by a disease (obviously).
But the economic effect of the disease is to remove vast numbers of workers from the system - because they are sick and cannot work, because their governments have told them not to operate in public spaces, or because demand for their services has disappeared.
The most stark example of that is Scandinavian Airlines, which has laid off 90% of its workers because no one is flying. "The demand for air travel is essentially non-existent," the airline said. It doesn't matter how cheap credit is, the company has nothing to spend it on.
Capitalism only exists because work exists - but coronavirus lockdowns essentially ban work
Work, and workers, are the basis of capitalism. Capitalism only functions - only exists - because work turns raw goods into objects of value, or because labour provides a service of value. If you can sell that value for more than the labour costs, investors have a business and workers have jobs.
The scary aspect of the coronavirus crisis is that with dozens of nations on lockdown - with workers trapped at home - it's not just a temporary lack of consumer demand that is the problem. It's a lack of the raw material - workers - that generates revenues and profits in the first place.
There is no central bank policy that can fix that.
And until the crisis passes, there is no way to imagine a mass return to work (or the shopping which work generates).
That's why this crisis, right now, looks scarier than 2008, and why markets are ignoring all that nearly-free money that central banks are dropping from the sky.
- My fiancé and I picked out my engagement ring together before he proposed, and I don't regret missing out on the surprise
- A 24-year-old stock trader who made over $8 million in 2 years shares the 4 indicators he uses as his guides to buy and sell
- You can buy more Yeezys today, if you can get past the app crashes and error messages
- India’s GDP forecast raised but El Nino, export contraction threats hover
- Choose hybrid vehicles over electric and conventional ones if you actually want to be sustainable, IIT Kanpur study says
- IPL 2023: A look at top players from each franchise
- Dalal Street sees 27-month high inflows from FIIs in May
- Sensex, Nifty50 likely to open in the green amid positive global cues: Coal India, Maruti Suzuki, Hero MotoCorp among stocks to watch