scorecardUnemployment claims may never go back to 'normal.' Here's why that's a good thing.
  1. Home
  2. policy
  3. economy
  4. news
  5. Unemployment claims may never go back to 'normal.' Here's why that's a good thing.

Unemployment claims may never go back to 'normal.' Here's why that's a good thing.

Juliana Kaplan,Ben Winck   

Unemployment claims may never go back to 'normal.' Here's why that's a good thing.
PolicyPolicy3 min read
  • Filings for unemployment insurance are still double prepandemic levels, and that may never change.
  • That's not necessarily a bad thing: It reflects an increased awareness of eligibility.
  • The CARES Act could mark a permanent shift in how Americans use UI, RAND's Kathryn Ann Edwards said.

Filings for unemployment benefits are still roughly double their prepandemic norm. There's reason to believe they'll never hit those lows - the old "normal" - ever again.

Weekly counts of jobless claims have fallen steadily as more Americans have gotten vaccinated and economic restrictions have been reversed. Initial claims most recently came in at 400,000, down slightly from the prior week but still much higher than readings before March 2020.

Claims may never again reach prepandemic lows because many Americans didn't realize they were eligible for unemployment insurance before the pandemic. The economic devastation of the past year and a half opened their eyes to the program, and the genie will likely remain out of the bottle.

Unemployment has become more important in recent weeks as 26 states end the federal boost to UI before the planned expiration in September. But as governors monitor claims for signs of a strong recovery, some economists are bracing for elevated counts to stick around.

Weekly claims data reflects not just the labor market's rebound but the UI program's performance, Kathryn Anne Edwards, an economist at the RAND Corporation, tweeted in July.

The share of unemployed Americans filing for benefits steadily declined from 1950 to 2019. That drop was likely fueled by tighter eligibility requirements like job-search rules and earnings tests, Edwards said.

"It's not that the majority of unemployed workers don't get UI, it's that the majority never apply for it," she added.

That changed when the $2.2 trillion CARES Act was enacted in March 2020. Whereas UI programs had been state-specific and varied, the historic stimulus package added a federal boost that elevated awareness. The ratio of claims to unemployed workers rose to its highest since 1950. Should that effectiveness hold, claims could remain well above their precrisis levels, Edwards said.

The CARES Act "changed the incentive, it changed the benefit's size, and it changed the delivery," Edwards told Insider. "We knew all three of those things were preventing people from applying before."

An argument to expand unemployment

The size of Congress' intervention revealed just how ineffective states' programs had become. Every recession since the 1970s left states with less funding for UI and a greater reliance on federal help. The CARES Act gave unemployed Americans the "meaningful" support that states couldn't provide on their own, Edwards said. If lawmakers want states to provide such a safety net, their programs need major reforms, she added.

"It really speaks to how low the programs had gotten, but also how little money states had to do anything similar," she said. "If states have learned anything from this recession, it's that their unemployment insurance matters less than what Congress will do. And Congress will do something."

Throughout the pandemic, federal programs have stepped in to fill the gaps that traditional unemployment insurance left. Pandemic Unemployment Assistance expanded eligibility to gig workers and self-employed workers - by the end of 2020, that program made up the greatest share of federal UI distributed.

The White House said in April that it was "committed to strengthening and reforming the system for the long term," and the enhanced benefit's looming expiration is pressuring lawmakers to pass lasting support. Some proposals would not only beef up benefits but permanently expand who can receive them.

Some Democrats have put forward legislation that would incorporate PUA recipients into a more permanent system. Since PUA explicitly included more workers, a permanent expansion would also keep claims elevated.

That means more unemployed workers would receive aid, which has always been the point of the program. That's a good thing.