India’s Supreme Court says those who buy auctioned property will have to pay prior electricity bills
- A purchaser of a mineral bottling plant that was auctioned refused to pay overdue
electricity dueswhich were unpaid by the previous owner.
- Seeking to quash the electricity authority’s demands, the purchaser approached the Telangana High Court, which granted him relief.
- Later, a Division Bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and KM Joseph overruled the High Court’s judgment, fixing the liability on the purchaser of the
The Supreme Court said that
Hearing a case between the auction-purchaser of a water bottling plant in Telangana and the Telangana Electricity Board, the bench — which included Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and KM Joseph — ruled that in this specific case, the buyer of the property was liable to pay to statutory electricity dues which were unpaid by the previous owner.
What is the case about?
The case is about the payment of statutory dues by the purchaser of an auctioned property.
In this particular instance, the purchaser refused to pay statutory electricity dues which were unpaid by the previous owner. The purchaser applied for a new electricity connection, but the authorities refused to provide the connection on the grounds that there were outstanding dues to be paid.
Seeking to quash these demands made by the authorities, the purchaser approached the Telangana High Court, which subsequently granted relief.
What did the Supreme Court say?
The case was subsequently raised by the Telangana Electricity Board in the Supreme Court, which observed that the purchaser was liable to clear the dues.
In its observation, the Supreme Court said, “Where, as in cases of the E-auction notice in question, the existence of electricity dues, whether quantified or not, has been specifically mentioned as a liability of the purchaser and the sale is on “as is where is, whatever there is and without recourse basis”, there can be no doubt that the liability to pay electricity dues exists on the respondent (purchaser).”
Who does it affect?
The ruling made by the Supreme Court affects anyone purchasing any property in an auction.
More specifically, during the auction, the auctioneer will have to mention specifically that the property is being sold on an “as is” basis, just like in the case above.
If this is explicitly mentioned, the purchaser of the property will inherit all the liabilities and assets associated with the property. The purchaser will also have no recourse in this regard.
India's Supreme Court won't allow 4G in Jammu and Kashmir— despite petitioners' plea that it's essential for healthcare, education and business during the coronavirus lockdown
Supreme Court asks states to consider home delivery of liquor amid lockdown
Indian Supreme Court's ego is coming in the way of peace between the government and telcos
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G announced with 5G and HDR Gaming support
- Reliance Jio is now twice as valued as Airtel that is down 25% from its peak in May
- Afghan National Army claims to have defused 4,776 home-made bombs and landmines in six months
- Sharechat’s ESOP pool hits $35 million as company allots $14 million to employees
- Microsoft acquires exclusive license for Elon Musk’s largest GPT-3 AI language model