- Once-celebrated journalist Seymour Hersh made unproven claims the US blew up the Nord Stream pipelines.
- Hersh won a Pulitzer in 1970, but his more recent work has come under sharp criticism.
A journalist's heavily disputed claim on Wednesday that the US government blew up the Nord Stream 2 pipelines sparked a flat rejection from the White House — and glee from the Kremlin.
$4 that the Biden administration partnered with Norway in a top-secret operation targeting the pipelines under the Baltic Sea, which were destroyed in June 2022.
The White House, contacted by Hersh for comment, called the story "false and complete fiction" and issued $4 after the article was published.
The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs told Insider: "These allegations are nonsense."
Hersh was once widely celebrated for his journalism, which uncovered the 1969 My Lai massacre in Vietnam and also $4$4.
In recent decades, he has come under criticism by those who call it poorly-sourced, conspiratorial, and over-reliant on anonymous sources. The open-source investigative outlet Bellingcat $4, and $4 that President Barack Obama did not, in fact, mastermind the killing of Osama bin Laden.
A gleeful endorsement
None of that stopped Russia, which swiftly endorsed Hersh's claim and breathlessly reported it via its closely controlled state media.
The central new claims of Hersh's article appear to rely on a single unnamed source, and included no details which Insider or other media outlets were able to verify.
It was $4, which many observers $4. Sweden, which has spent months investigating the pipeline destruction, $4 but did not say by whom.
In Russia, Hersh's story was immediately greeted with a sense of vindication. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov $4 that Hersh's article was not a surprise in Moscow and said it would bring "consequences" for the US.
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova $4, citing the multiple times that Russia suggested the US was behind the attack, also without evidence.
Russian politician Konstantin Kosachev $4 that the saying the reporting is "impossible to dismiss."
Those remarks were shared by TV personality Vladimir Solovyev, arguably Russia's leading propagandist, $4.
$4 called the article "remarkable," though he added that "some points can be disputed" and that some "need proof."
All breezily dismissed the unusually explicit rebuttal from US officials.
$4 a review of the Russian press reaction to the claims.
High-stakes blame game
The $4, discovered in September last year, was quickly assessed as $4 and likely caused by $4.
Investigations remain inconclusive. In December unnamed US and EU officials $4 that there was no strong evidence that Russia was behind the attack. More recently, $4.
However, the evidence-free theory that President Joe Biden engineered the explosions has long circulated $4, echoed by Russian officials.
It is largely based on remarks made by Biden in early February 2022, and the theory that the pipeline's destruction would be politically advantageous to the US.
Biden had said he opposed opening the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and saying the US could "bring an end to" it if Russia invaded Ukraine.
The pipeline was due to supply vast amounts of cheap Russian gas to Europe, a move that the US believed would give Russia political leverage over its neighbors.
The invasion did take place, and officials in Germany — where the pipeline was due to pump its gas — $4 before Nord Stream 2 moved any gas. Nord Stream 1 kept pumping until the explosion.
Hersh's article recounted this and went further, describing in detail an alleged plot in which US divers, under cover of publicly-announced undersea exercises, planted the explosives at a spot off the Norwegian coast.
The central claims of the 5,200-word article appear to be based on a single source, who is described only as having "direct knowledge of the operational planning."
$4, Hersch refused to reveal their name but said: "It's a person, who, it seems, knows a lot about what's going on." Hersh declined to comment when contacted by Insider.