A lawsuit that accused Google of collecting the data of people who were using incognito mode can continue, said a federal judge
- A federal judge on Friday denied
incognitomode tracking case.
- The complaint said users weren't notified Google collected data even during private browsing.
- "'Incognito' does not mean 'invisible,'" Google's lawyers wrote.
A federal judge denied Google's motion to dismiss a
The suit, Brown v. Google, alleged that Google collected data when users were using
In asking for a dismissal, Google said users were given enough information about how their activity might be tracked while using the private browsing mode. Insider has reached out to the company for comment.
"Google also makes clear that 'Incognito' does not mean 'invisible,' and that the user's activity during that session may be visible to websites they visit, and any third-party analytics or ads services the visited websites use," Google's lawyers wrote.
But Google's argument was rejected on Friday by Lucy Koh, a judge for the northern district of California.
Koh, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, wrote: "First, Google cannot demonstrate that Plaintiffs expressly consented because Google did not notify users that it would be engaging in the alleged data collection while Plaintiffs were in private browsing mode."
The class-action lawsuit was filed in June 2020, with three plaintiffs attached to it. In their initial complaint, they said Google tracked their internet use between June 1, 2016, and the present. The tracking continued in private browsing mode, without their consent and without "a legitimate business interest" from Google, they said.
"Secret monitoring of web private browsing is highly offensive behavior," the suit said.
In the months since the suit was filed, tech giants have wrestled with how much consumer activity should be tracked.
There was a battle brewing between Facebook and Apple, after the iPhone maker announced software updates that would limit some
At the same time, federal lawmakers are renewing their focus on whether the internet ad businesses run by Google and Facebook violate antitrust laws.
Rep. David Cicilline, antitrust subcommittee chairman, said during a hearing on Friday: "Overall, the market power of Google and Facebook is reinforced by the unprecedented amount of data collected by these companies, along with other factors that have tipped digital markets in favor of these firms and blocked rivals and new entrants from challenging their dominance."
Google this month said it would shift away from precision-targeting ads and would no longer track specific users as they browse the web.
"We remain committed to preserving a vibrant and open ecosystem where people can access a broad range of ad-supported content with confidence that their privacy and choices are respected," David Temkin, director of product management for ads privacy and trust, wrote in a blog post.
- SIMPLY PUT: What happened before India got Freedom@Midnight
- Here’s how much banks have increased home loan interest rates
- Avatar 2, Black Panther 2, Ant Man — Here is a complete list of Hollywood movies expected to hit Indian theaters in the next 6-7 months
- Taj Hotels’ Qmin food delivery app claims to be the only profitable business among its peers
- India's foreign exchange reserves fall to $573 bn