Facebook and Google have been accused of striking a secret, illegal advertising deal
- A coalition of state attorneys general filed an
- They accused Google of giving
- Per Wired, if this deal is proved to be true, it could spell big trouble for Google and Facebook, as it would fall under part of the Sherman Antitrust Act that has a relatively low bar for illegality.
- Google denied the claims, and Facebook was not immediately available for comment.
A coalition of state attorneys general is accusing Google of striking an illegal, under-the-table deal with Facebook.
The coalition, led by Texas' attorney general,
Google denied the claims, while Facebook was not immediately available for comment.Header bidding is a way for publishers - i.e., websites and apps - to sell ad space online. It allows multiple advertisers to bid on the same bit of ad space simultaneously, with the publisher taking the highest bidder's offer and placing its ad. It's seen an alternative to Google's ad-placement system, which runs the auction in a sequence, known in the adtech industry as "waterfalling" or a "daisy chain."
In the suit, the states accuse Google of striking a deal with Facebook to stop it from getting into header bidding, affording Facebook privileges in advertising auctions on its platform."An internal Facebook communication at the highest level suggested that Facebook's header bidding announcement was part of a planned long-term strategy [...] to draw Google in," they said. "Facebook decided to dangle the threat of competition in Google's face and then cut a deal to manipulate the auction," they added.
A Google representative denied the lawsuit's claims in a statement to Business Insider.
"Attorney General Paxton's
Per Wired, if this deal is proved to be true, it could spell big trouble for Google and Facebook, as it would fall under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Section 1 forbids entities from striking agreements that "unreasonably restrain trade," and the threshold for establishing illegality is relatively low."If you can prove an agreement between two firms, once you have proof of that agreement, it is called per se illegal," Sally Hubbard, a director at the anti-monopoly think tank the Open Markets Institute, told Wired.
Per Reuters, corporations that violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act face penalties of up to $100 million.Both Google and Facebook have shouldered bigger fines than $100 million before, but it would set a troubling precedent for the companies, both of which are facing antitrust scrutiny.
The US Department of Justice filed a separate antitrust lawsuit against Google in October over its ads and search business, and Politico reported Tuesday that another group of state attorneys general, led by Colorado and Nebraska, were planning to file another antitrust suit as soon as Thursday.Facebook, meanwhile, was hit with two simultaneous lawsuits last week from the Federal Trade Commission and 46 state attorneys general, focusing on its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
- Here’s a tiny washing machine that cleans your TWS earbuds in two minutes
- 106-year-old woman in Madhya Pradesh gets her first COVID-19 vaccine
- Facebook's ad delivery system shows gender bias, says new study
- Check out the top 10 batsmen with the highest strike rate in all IPL matches
- Petrol pumps closed in Rajasthan as dealers demand rollback of VAT on fuel