The hypocrisy of the Alex Jones purge shows Facebook is morally spineless

InfoWars

Alex Jones on InfoWars.

• Alex Jones, the king of conspiracy theories, had his YouTube channel, Apple podcasts, Facebook page, and Spotify content all scrubbed off the internet over the last few days.
• As late as July, Facebook had defended Jones' right to publish and long resisted taking his pages down, saying it was a "fundamental" value for them to protect Jones' platform.
• Facebook now says they removed him for glorifying violence and hate speech.
• Jones has long glorified violence and spouted hate speech, and this example proves that Facebook is a spineless corporation.

When Facebook removed the page of Alex Jones, InfoWars host and king of conspiracy theories, it violated a value it called "fundamental" less than one month ago - and it perfectly illustrates how the tech titan has no backbone or moral leadership.

"We believe banning these Pages would be contrary to the basic principles of free speech," Facebook said when asked by CNN's Oliver Darcy why Infowars still had a presence on the site after it stated it would clamp down on fake news in mid-July.

Complimentary Tech Event

Transform talent with learning that works

Capability development is critical for businesses who want to push the envelope of innovation.Discover how business leaders are strategizing around building talent capabilities and empowering employee transformation.Know More

"I think part of the fundamental thing here is that we created Facebook to be a place where different people can have a voice. And different publishers have very different points of view," John Hegeman, the head of Facebook's News Feed told Darcy at the time.

In removing Jones yesterday, Facebook betrayed its "fundamental" belief that "different people can have a voice" that express "very different points of view." It was, by Facebook's own admission, "contrary to the basic principles of free speech."

From Facebook on removing Jones on August 6: "We have taken it down for glorifying violence, which violates our graphic-violence policy, and using dehumanizing language to describe people who are transgender, Muslims, and immigrants, which violates our hate-speech policies."

Buzzfeed senior technology writer Charlie Warzel says that staff inside Facebook - and other companies who have made similar moves - have abandoned their principles:

"last 6 months I've had dozens of convos w/ ppl at YT & FB. most have taken principled stands about why this channel had to remain up. They suggested those pressuring to remove the page didn't understand nuances of moderation. Funny how that all evaporated after Apple took action! ... feels like a legit credibility issue for the platforms w/ many of the journalists who cover them. ... the decision to flip the policy completely would seem to cast doubt on all the past explanations of why Jones was allowed to stay up for so long."

In 2012, Jones suggested the parents of the 20 six- and seven-year-old children killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut were paid "crisis actors" and that no such shooting took place. When 17 highschoolers died at another school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Jones again suggested the survivors were actors.

Jones pushed the "Pizzagate" conspiracy that eventually saw an armed gunman show up at a Washington DC pizza restaurant demanding to investigate it as a possible sex trafficking hub for children with links to Hillary Clinton, who Jones considers a demon.

Jones frequently accuses Muslims of trying to take over Western countries and subvert their laws, notably saying Muslims demanded England's Queen Elizabeth convert or leave her ancestral home.

Perhaps at Facebook, one of the world's biggest corporations, ad sales and public relations take precedent over any moral principles.

Did Facebook remove Jones because he glorified violence or used dehumanizing language against Muslims or transgender individuals? There's ample evidence to say Jones had done that on Facebook for years.

Did Facebook worry about dehumanizing when it spread anti-Muslim hate speech in Myanmar during an active ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine?

In defending Jones, Facebook claimed to have some backbone and some stomach for bad press when its principles were in play. But when Apple pulled out, and Facebook alone had to stand for its stated values, Facebook didn't lead, but followed the cue from its fellow tech giants, and that spine was nowhere to be found.