The Republican presidential-debate demands are falling apart
Thomson Reuters
After last week's presidential debate on CNBC sparked cries that the it was full of "gotcha" questions and supposed liberal bias from moderators, representatives from the Republican campaigns met to create a set of terms for future presidential debates.
Less than a day after the meeting, Donald Trump's campaign announced that it was opting out of the agreement and would carry out its network negotiations independently. Shortly after, the campaigns of John Kasich, Chris Christie, and Carly Fiorina announced that they do not intend to sign the debate agreement, according to CNN.
A campaign staffer told CNN that the candidates leaving the agreement makes the weekend's negotiations "a total waste of time" because "it only works if everybody signs it."
The now defunct terms reportedly included bypassing the Republican National Committee in coordinating with network hosts, minimum lengths for mandatory opening and closing statements, an equal number of questions for the candidates, preapproval of on-screen graphics, and a ban on "lightning rounds."
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- Saudi Arabia wants China to help fund its struggling $500 billion Neom megaproject. Investors may not be too excited.
- One of the world's only 5-star airlines seems to be considering asking business-class passengers to bring their own cutlery
- From terrace to table: 8 Edible plants you can grow in your home
- India fourth largest military spender globally in 2023: SIPRI report
- New study forecasts high chance of record-breaking heat and humidity in India in the coming months
- Gold plunges ₹1,450 to ₹72,200, silver prices dive by ₹2,300
- Strong domestic demand supporting India's growth: Morgan Stanley