The Republican presidential-debate demands are falling apart
After last week's presidential debate on CNBC sparked cries that the it was full of "gotcha" questions and supposed liberal bias from moderators, representatives from the Republican campaigns met to create a set of terms for future presidential debates.
Less than a day after the meeting, Donald Trump's campaign announced that it was opting out of the agreement and would carry out its network negotiations independently. Shortly after, the campaigns of John Kasich, Chris Christie, and Carly Fiorina announced that they do not intend to sign the debate agreement, according to CNN.
A campaign staffer told CNN that the candidates leaving the agreement makes the weekend's negotiations "a total waste of time" because "it only works if everybody signs it."
The now defunct terms reportedly included bypassing the Republican National Committee in coordinating with network hosts, minimum lengths for mandatory opening and closing statements, an equal number of questions for the candidates, preapproval of on-screen graphics, and a ban on "lightning rounds."
- Elizabeth Holmes ordered dinners for Theranos staff but made sure they weren't delivered until after 8 p.m. so they worked late: book
- My twin and I were in separate classrooms in school. Our joint math lesson made me realize how silly that was.
- Elizabeth Holmes was so obsessed with Steve Jobs she wanted an Apple flag flown half-mast at Theranos after he died: book
- Kochi startup that connects farmers & consumers selected for UN's Accelerator Programme
- Google rolling out smart compose feature in Chat on web
- Pan-India drug trafficking cartel using cryptocurrency through dark net busted
- Strengthening ties: India gifts 3,000 LPG gas stoves to underprivileged families in Nepal
- Honda unveils Elevate SUV to compete with Creta, Seltos and Grand Vitara