How to fix a toxic workplace, according to 2 leadership experts — including one who was brought in to repair Uber's culture
- Frances Frei is a professor at
Harvard Business Schooland the former senior vice president of leadershipand strategyat Uber; Anne Morriss is a leadership coach and the founder of The Leadership Consortium.
- The following is an
excerptfrom their book, "UNLEASHED: The Unapologetic Leader's Guide to Empowering Everyone Around You."
- In it, they talk about their experience working with major companies and top execs to dismantle toxic workplace culture.
- Frei and Morriss share how it's important to encourage healthy criticism of company leadership through anonymous feedback, one-on-one discussions, and exit interviews.
- For leaders, the authors say to set your ego aside and accept that you are responsible for the psychological safety of employees in your workplace.
By June of 2017, the mandate to change the culture at
Kalanick took responsibility for the company's cultural missteps, including its emphasis on growth at all costs and its transactional approach to stakeholder relationships. He acknowledged that the values that had driven Uber to its surreal, historic positioning — to becoming the most valuable startup in the world — also had an unanticipated downside. "There's a lot of good intent behind our values," he wrote, but he conceded that they had also been misused and misinterpreted. And then he used a descriptor for this distortion that would have gotten everyone's attention: "weaponized."Advertisement
This word is sometimes used too casually, but it wasn't in Uber's case. Here's our definition of a weaponized value: it's the manipulation of an espoused value to disempower, or in extreme cases, harm someone. It's the opposite of leadership in that it's all about the weaponizer and their own interests. A weaponized value dresses up a new belief in the guise of an old one. It changes the meaning of what is true without the rest of the organization's consent. For example, we worked with one company that listed "default to trust" among its core values. This phrase was meant to remind everyone to give each other the benefit of the doubt, a noble idea, but it began to be used to shut down healthy dissent. "Default to trust," a manager might say to a direct report who questioned the plan or offered an alternative viewpoint.
It was clear that there were parts of Uber's culture that had indeed been weaponized, which was one of the reasons Kalanick invited Frances to join the team. We still fantasize about what might have been if we had gotten the call earlier, whether we could have helped to head off some of the pain the company went through. In our experience, a pattern of weaponization is a lagging indicator of an unhealthy culture. Our goal is to give others the tools to diagnose and change culture before this critical phase, at the point when culture simply needs to be repaired (rather than stripped to the studs for a gut renovation).
How do you know when you're at a cultural moment of truth? The trite answer is that people will often tell you. When Susan Fowler endured her very, very strange year at Uber, she reported her experiences internally well before she chose to share them publicly. The facts of her case never made it all the way to Kalanick, from what we understand, but because of the courage of Fowler and other culture whistleblowers, we now live in a world where feedback on culture is finally making its way to all the people who need to hear it.It helps that culture has become a relatively well-understood concept, thanks in part to workplace norms that have placed it at the center of the talent wars. Great employees want to work in environments where their values are aligned with their employer's, and they're increasingly vocal about demanding it. If you suspect your culture needs a refresh, we advise being super direct with your colleagues. Ask them what about your existing culture is and is not working. Chase down the answer with the conviction that Schein might be right and it's the most important thing you do as a leader. The goal in these discussions is to develop a reasonable hypothesis that you can then test more systematically. We suggest gathering this informal data in intimate, interactive formats such as small groups or one-on-one discussions. Start with the empathy anchors on your team, the people who are naturally wired into the experiences of others. Include the truth tellers and people with nothing to lose. Add a culture discussion to all exit interviews. (A question we've found particularly useful in exit interviews is, "As someone who cares deeply about the culture here, is there anything you think I should know about your experience or the experiences of other people?") Control for status, function, and anything else that might be a variable in how people experience what is true. If you have reason to believe you won't get an honest answer — if psychological safety isn't a cultural given — then do what it takes to protect the messengers.Advertisement
As you develop your intuition, here are some conversational entry points that we've seen work:
- How well do you think our culture sets people up for success? Are there ways that it also undermines their effectiveness?
- Have any of our values or commitments to each other become "empty" or even "weaponized"?
- How aligned is our culture with our current challenges and opportunities?
- What do we need to change culturally to achieve our most ambitious goals?
A more difficult part of this intuition-building process can be to listen — really listen — to what you hear in these discussions, with the curiosity of an anthropologist and the radical accountability of a leader. Listen as someone responsible for the experiences of others, both in your presence and in your absence. Listen without your ego or internal defenses getting in the way. The objective is to convince yourself you need a culture shift before you prepare to convince others.Advertisement
Kalanick's infamous "toe-stepping" maxim was one of the first values to be publicly retired when Dara Khosrowshahi took the helm as CEO. As Khosrowshahi explained in a widely read LinkedIn post, "'Toe- stepping' was meant to encourage employees to share their ideas regardless of their seniority or position in the company, but too often it was used as an excuse for being an a------." He went on to acknowledge an inconvenient truth: that the shared assumptions and behaviors that got Uber here were not going to carry the company all the way there, to a sustainable, thriving company.
This is incredibly common tension that's not limited to the world of technology startups. Indeed, we believe that some variation on this challenge is at play inside almost every organization. Practically every company we know is relying in some way on assumptions and behaviors that need to be updated to reflect their current reality. Which elements of your culture might be doing more harm than good at this point? Is there anything that got you here that's now standing in the way of your ability to go there?Reprinted by permission of Harvard
Frances Frei is a professor at Harvard Business School who recently served as Uber's first senior vice president of leadership and strategy to help the company navigate its very public crisis in leadership and culture. Anne Morriss is a leadership coach and the executive founder of The Leadership Consortium, a first-of-its-kind leadership accelerator that works to help more and varied leaders thrive.Read the original article on Business Insider
- India's GDP to contract by 3 pc in FY21: BofA
- 87-yr-old woman, her nonagenarian husband in Delhi defeat COVID-19
- COVID-19 brain complications found across the globe: Lancet study
- Honda launches BS-VI compliant diesel version of Civic at Rs 20.75 lakh
- Delhi Police ASI dies after testing positive for COVID-19