Ken Griffin said in an op-ed that the US and its allies should helpEurope wean off Russiannatural gas .- Europe increased its energy dependence on
Russia , hoping to temper the country's militarism, he and historian Niall Ferguson wrote.
Billionaire hedge fund manager $4 has a strategy to beat Russian President
$4 for the Wall Street Journal, the founder and chief executive officer of
"Without Russian energy, European citizens would struggle to get through winter," Griffin and Ferguson wrote, just hours before Russia's attack on
To solve the problem, the op-ed suggested a game plan.
First, the US should encourage Europe to reduce its reliance on Russian gas. Then it should start producing more gas, not less, so it has what's "needed to wean Europe off Russian pipelines."
Lastly, the US should push its friends and allies — like major gas producers Australia and Qatar — to be long-term suppliers to Europe. The more the sources, the safer Europe's energy supply, the op-ed said.
Griffin and Ferguson likened the current situation to the Soviet blockade of Berlin in 1948, in which the US and UK responded by airlifting supplies to the German city, eventually breaking Russia's hold.
"If planeloads of food can get the better of Stalin, boatloads of gas can get the better of Mr. Putin," the two wrote.
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been heating up for weeks, and it recently took a turn for the worse. Late Monday, Russia deployed its troops into breakaway areas of Ukraine, and the West responded with an initial round of economic sanctions. Then Thursday, Russia launched a full-scale attack on the country, and G7 leaders discussed responding with "$4."
But sanctions, according to Griffin and Ferguson, "would come at a tremendous cost to Americans without addressing the long-term source of Mr. Putin's power," meaning Europe's dependence on Russian natural gas.
"Tougher U.S. financial sanctions would only further reduce the attractiveness of the dollar as a reserve currency," the op-ed warned. "Withholding U.S. technology from Russia would inflict both direct and indirect damage on American companies, which have many international competitors, not least in China."