Government may ask WhatsApp, Snapchat to store your private information
Advertisement
Government is planning to come up with new rules that will require companies like Google , WhatsApp , Snapchat , and Amazon to store client data. This is a development that will face a considerable measure of opposition.
A committee has been set up by the government for drafting rules for Section 67C of the Information Technology Act.
What the government is looking to do now is draft rules for Section 67C of the Information Technology Act. The rules, whose drafting has been holding up since 2008, will explain what sort of information has to be stored, in what format, and for what time period, as per three individuals from the recently framed council.
Sharing of data between outside firms and the Indian government has been a combative issue, and specialists said the order might be difficult to execute for firms, for example, WhatsApp that promise end-to-end encryption. Or for Snapchat - a chat app where messages disappear within seconds and are not even stored on the company's servers.
Firms may also oppose the diktat, especially since most of them are not governed by Indian laws and also due to the high cost of data retention.
The committee is lead by additional secretary in the ministry of electronics and IT (MEITY), Ajay Kumar , and has one representative each from the ministry of home affairs, department of telecom, department of personnel and training, Nasscom , Internet Service Provider Association of India (ISPAI), along with an advocate specialising in cyber law and a few officers from MEITY .
"This is a fairly complex issue, compounded by the general lack of understanding of mobile apps and over the top service providers," a person on the committee who did not wish to be identified told ET.
He also said that most technology firms are US based and they have always been at loggerheads about sharing of information with the government.
"Even if it is for national security reasons, how much are these companies answerable to the Indian security establishment? And we do know howApple refused to unlock the phone even for FBI ," he added.
However,Supreme Court and cyber law expert Pavan Duggal assured that the section is drafted in very broad terms and the move may be driven by the realisation that these companies are huge data repositories - some of which might be relevant to law enforcement investigations.
Duggal told ET.
Section 67C refers to the obligation of the service providers to hold data, the nature of the data to be retained and the time period is not specified. Companies which do not comply with the law can be levied fine and its officers imprisoned.
(image: Indiatimes)
Advertisement
A committee has been set up by the government for drafting rules for Section 67C of the Information Technology Act.
What the government is looking to do now is draft rules for Section 67C of the Information Technology Act. The rules, whose drafting has been holding up since 2008, will explain what sort of information has to be stored, in what format, and for what time period, as per three individuals from the recently framed council.
Sharing of data between outside firms and the Indian government has been a combative issue, and specialists said the order might be difficult to execute for firms, for example, WhatsApp that promise end-to-end encryption. Or for Snapchat - a chat app where messages disappear within seconds and are not even stored on the company's servers.
Firms may also oppose the diktat, especially since most of them are not governed by Indian laws and also due to the high cost of data retention.
Advertisement
"This is a fairly complex issue, compounded by the general lack of understanding of mobile apps and over the top service providers," a person on the committee who did not wish to be identified told ET.
He also said that most technology firms are US based and they have always been at loggerheads about sharing of information with the government.
"Even if it is for national security reasons, how much are these companies answerable to the Indian security establishment? And we do know how
However,
Advertisement
"It will have to be a huge balancing act and will be interesting to see what this committee decides," Section 67C refers to the obligation of the service providers to hold data, the nature of the data to be retained and the time period is not specified. Companies which do not comply with the law can be levied fine and its officers imprisoned.
(image: Indiatimes)
Advertisement
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- Saudi Arabia wants China to help fund its struggling $500 billion Neom megaproject. Investors may not be too excited.
- Catan adds climate change to the latest edition of the world-famous board game
- Tired of blatant misinformation in the media? This video game can help you and your family fight fake news!
- Tired of blatant misinformation in the media? This video game can help you and your family fight fake news!
- JNK India IPO allotment – How to check allotment, GMP, listing date and more
- Indian Army unveils selfie point at Hombotingla Pass ahead of 25th anniversary of Kargil Vijay Diwas
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market