Lyft is using a controversial new stock structure in its IPO that will let its founders keep 'significant control' of the company

Advertisement
Lyft is using a controversial new stock structure in its IPO that will let its founders keep 'significant control' of the company

John Zimmers, Logan Green, lyft, sv100 2015

Stephen Lam/Reuters

Logan Green and John Zimmer co-founded Lyft in 2012.

Advertisement
  • Lyft will have two classes of stock when it goes public this year, it said in documents filed Friday.
  • Class B shares, held by executives including the two founders, will have 20 votes while traditional Class A shares hawked to new investors will have one vote each.
  • Most tech companies that go public now are using a similar structure, and some organizations have pushed back against the growing trend.

There's a growing trend among tech companies when they go public: keeping power in the hands of founders.

Lyft's public filing of its S-1 document on Friday has proved no exception.

According to the prospectus, Lyft's IPO will feature a dual-class share structure that gives founders Logan Green and John Zimmer "significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets."

The document does not say the exact percentage of Class B stock - shares of which get 20 votes each compared to Class A's one -but does show that the founders along with other executives also own about 27% of outstanding Class A stock.

Advertisement

According to a Wall Street Journal Report, the company is are working on a plan that would give them near-majority control of the app-based car ride firm after its initial public offering. A spokesperson for the company declined to comment on that report, citing a mandatory IPO quiet period.

It's part of a growing - but controversial - trend

Until now, the practice has been rare. As Business Insider's Troy Wolverton pointed out last week, Google and Facebook's use of them was a rare exception years ago.

In 2004, when Google went public, for instance, it was one of just three tech companies and 13 firms overall that went public with a dual-class structure, according to data collected by Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida. That year, 174 total companies had an IPO.

In the last two years, though, 13 tech firms hit public markets with dual-class structures, including Snap, Roku, Dropbox, and Spotify.

Advertisement

Essentially, the now common practice leaves retail investors with little say in how a company is run.

"The principle of one-share, one-vote is a foundation of good corporate governance and equitable treatment of investors," Kenneth Bertsch, executive director of the Council of Institutional Investors, said in a letter to Lyft's board of directors in February.

"CII believes public companies should provide all shareholders with voting rights proportional to their holdings."

More from Lyft's IPO filing:

{{}}