Some aren't buying Kushner's lawyers' explanation for security clearance form omissions
Pool/Getty Images
The most recently submitted form includes disclosures of more than 100 foreign contacts, CBS News reported, along with the now-infamous June 2016 meeting Kushner attended with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, along with Donald Trump Jr., then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and an additional Russian lobbyist.
Kushner had originally submitted his form, known as an SF-86, on Jan. 18 and disclosed no meetings with foreign government officials during the presidential campaign and transition.
Democrats including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida have called for Kushner's security clearance to be revoked in light of the news about the June 2016 meeting.
Kushner's lawyers told Yahoo News that the omission of the meeting with Veselnitskaya was "inadvertent," and said a Kushner staffer had prematurely hit the "send" button on the SF-86 form before it had been fully completed.
But this explanation quickly triggered skepticism from critics and those familiar with SF-86 forms and their filing procedures.
According to instructions listed on the National Background Investigations Bureau's website, the form requires applicants to disclose whether they have had "close and/or continuing contact with a foreign national within the last seven years with who you, or your spouse, or cohabitant are bound by affection, influence, common interests, and/or obligation."
The form, which can be filed electronically, includes checkboxes for "Yes" or "No," and has a "Save" button below the question to preserve the answer.
The form must also undergo a certification process, meaning verifying "that all your answers are true and complete to the best of your knowledge," giving the applicant one more opportunity to make corrections or additions to the form.
The form can then be electronically signed and filed.
1- Having filled out dozens of SF-86 Security Clearance forms and been interviewed numerous times as well, this is just BS.
- Price Floyd (@pricefloyd) July 14, 2017
Modern one can be signed electronically but it goes through several screens to make sure you want to submit. This is highly implausible
- Kirsten O'Nell (@ohkirsten) July 14, 2017
Note that the SF86 specifically instructs the applicant to review all answers for completeness and accuracy before signing. pic.twitter.com/b6f5z86vsZ
- Sam Bagenstos (@sbagen) July 14, 2017
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- An Ambani disruption in OTT: At just ₹1 per day, you can now enjoy ad-free content on JioCinema
- Indian heart beats inside Pakistani woman, 19-year-old from Karachi undergoes heart transplant in Chennai
- Rupee falls 7 paise to settle at 83.35 against US dollar
- Vegetable prices to remain high until June due to above-normal temperature
- RBI action on Kotak Mahindra Bank may restrain credit growth, profitability: S&P
- 'Vote and have free butter dosa': Bengaluru eateries do their bit to increase voter turnout
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market