The 'Daesh effect' is rekindling a risky strategy for fighting terrorism
Fadi al-Halabi/AFP/Getty Images
A US-led initiative to train and equip 5,000 moderate Syrian rebels has graduated just 60 soldiers in six months, Iraqi security forces are still complaining that they are unprepared and ill-equipped to face the extremists, and Kurdish advances against ISIS, while notable, have irked Turkey and exacerbated ethnic tensions in the region.
And now, as in decades past, some Western government are "altering their threat assessments of violent groups in an apparent effort to enlist them in the fight against the Islamic State," Jonathan Schanzer, vice president for research at Foundation for Defense of Democracies, writes in Politico.
"Call it the Daesh effect."
Schanzer, former terrorism finance analyst at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, describes how assessments of militant groups in Syria, Iraq, Gaza, Libya, and Afghanistan are being viewed in terms of "lesser evil" as ISIS spreads beyond the Middle East.
"[Syrian militant group Jabhat al-Nusra] is a unique version of al Qaeda. They manage to cooperate with non-Islamist and non-jihadi organizations in one coalition," retired Brig. Gen. Michael Herzog, a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and former chief of staff for Israel's defense minister, told the Wall Street Journal.
Former US ambassador to Syria Ryan Crocker also lauded Nusra - a US-designated terrorist organization - as a potentially useful ally in the fight against ISIS.
And after clashing with ISIS in Afghanistan earlier this year, even the Taliban came out looking like the good guys.
"It may only be a matter of time before Western governments, which have already committed to leaving Afghanistan after years of warring with the Taliban (and losing), look at the former hosts of Al Qaeda in the 1990s-and the original Islamic State-as a more moderate faction," Schanzer writes.
Reuters
Emile Hokayem, a Middle East security analyst with the International Institute for Strategic Studies, noted the risks inherent in the US and its allies edging closer to their enemies.
"If you cooperate with one group, you lose another," he told the Wall Street Journal. "It looks good on paper, but it's impossible to implement."
Significantly, the idea that ISIS must be countered at all costs benefits those who systematically create terror themselves.
"Undoubtedly, the Daesh Effect is strongest among those who believe that Iran, the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, is somehow the answer to the Islamic State," Schanzer writes."
Read the entire piece in Politico >
- I'm an interior designer. Here are 10 things in your living room you should get rid of.
- Higher-paid employees looking for work are having a tough time, and it could be a sign of a shift in the workplace
- A software engineer shares the résumé he's used since college that got him a $500,000 job at Meta — plus offers at TikTok and LinkedIn
- 7 scenic Indian villages perfect for May escapes
- Paneer snacks you can prepare in 30 minutes
- Markets crash: Investors' wealth erodes by ₹2.25 lakh crore
- Stay healthy and hydrated: 10 immunity-boosting fruit-based lemonades
- Here’s what you can do to recover after eating oily food
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market