VC veteran Ben Horowitz reveals how Silicon Valley really thinks about diversity in hiring
YouTube screenshot/MilkenInstitute
Swisher asked Horowitz about the Kleiner Perkins gender discrimination trial. Much of what Horowitz had to say was brutally honest. Basically, Silicon Valley won't be hiring a more diverse workforce until they see hard evidence that it will improve their bottom line.
"When you're building a startup, you're fighting for your life. You aren't going to do anything for corporate responsibility," he said.
Horowitz differentiated between two different kinds of decisions: the public ones, which get touted in press releases, and the private ones, which are much more important in dictating what actually goes on in the day-to-day operations of a company. Those private decisions, he said, aren't going to be influenced by outsider complaints that there isn't enough diversity in tech:
The decisions that get made in the dark, who gets hired, how they're treated, those do not change from social pressure. I think in some ways there's backlash [against public pressure]. You've got to have a mechanism that works in the dark. That mechanism has got to be really specifically, "How does it help your self interest?", or it just doesn't work.
Research suggests that having a more diverse workforce is better for innovation. From the December 2013 issue of the Harvard Business Review:
Without diverse leadership, women are 20% less likely than straight white men to win endorsement for their ideas; people of color are 24% less likely; and LGBTs are 21% less likely. This costs their companies crucial market opportunities, because inherently diverse contributors understand the unmet needs in under-leveraged markets. We've found that when at least one member of a team has traits in common with the end user, the entire team better understands that user. A team with a member who shares a client's ethnicity is 152% likelier than another team to understand that client.
Horowitz also had something interesting to say about women at the top of his firm:
The firm would get a lot more credit - a 1000% more credit - if we had one general partner who is a woman, than if we have got 53% women in the firm ... there's no question in my mind that that's the least impactful thing because nobody in the firm reports to a general partner. And those jobs are not opportunities, because the requirement is that you have to be a founder or a successful CEO of a company in order to get those jobs. Those people don't need jobs... why should that be a goal?
To that, Swisher responded, "I do think you can do both. Why don't you do both?"
Disclosure: Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, is an investor in Business Insider.
- Colon cancer rates are rising in young people. If you have two symptoms you should get a colonoscopy, a GI oncologist says.
- I spent $2,000 for 7 nights in a 179-square-foot room on one of the world's largest cruise ships. Take a look inside my cabin.
- An Ambani disruption in OTT: At just ₹1 per day, you can now enjoy ad-free content on JioCinema
- SC rejects pleas seeking cross-verification of votes cast using EVMs with VVPAT
- Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 electric sports bike launched in India starting at ₹2.99 lakh
- Deloitte projects India's FY25 GDP growth at 6.6%
- Italian PM Meloni invites PM Modi to G7 Summit Outreach Session in June
- Markets rally for 6th day running on firm Asian peers; Tech Mahindra jumps over 12%
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market