Antonin Scalia's death had a profound impact on the ruling in favor of affirmative action in college admissions
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
The court ruled 4-3 in the university's favor, with Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor delivering the opinion of the court, and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and John Roberts dissenting.
Justice Elena Kagan recused herself from the case.
Perhaps one of the most important justices for the outcome of the case was not in the bench for the decision. Antonin Scalia, a staunch opponent of race-based admissions, died in February, aged 79. Along with Kagan's recusal, Scalia's death removed the possibility of a 4-4 split decision.
The UT case centered on Abigail Fisher, a white woman denied admission to Texas' flagship public university in 2008, who claimed her race played a factor in her rejection. She argued that the university denied her admission in favor of less-qualified black and Hispanic students and that her constitutional right to equal protection was violated.
For its part, UT argued that its "holistic" admissions plan did not make race the sole factor but only one component of the contributions an applicant would bring to campus.
When the case was first heard in 2013, the justices originally looked to vote 5-3 against Texas. But the court deferred that decision and voted a compromise decision instead, Business Insider's Peter Jacobs wrote, citing Legal journalist Joan Biskupic's 2014 book on Justice Sonia Sotomayor, "Breaking In: The Rise of Sonia Sotomayor and the Politics of Justice."
AP Photo/Susan Walsh
After Scalia's death, the justices were forced to decide the case without the possibility of a split with seven justices on the bench. Perhaps surprisingly, Justice Kennedy emerged as the unlikely hero of affirmative action, voting for the first time to uphold an affirmative-action program.
Aside from allowing a possible split decision, Kent Greenfield, a law professor at Boston College Law School, thinks Scalia's presence may have altered Kennedy's decision.
"If Scalia had been on the court, [Kennedy] might have been persuaded to write the case differently," Greenfield told Business Insider via email.
"This is a case in which the court could have been different with Scalia, in the sense that it might have been 4 to 4, but Scalia is such a powerful advocate for color-blindness in the law that one could imagine Scalia having some impact on Kennedy's views," he said, further stating the impact of Scalia's death on the case.
- US buys 81 Soviet-era combat aircraft from Russia's ally costing on average less than $20,000 each, report says
- 2 states where home prices are falling because there are too many houses and not enough buyers
- A couple accidentally shipped their cat in an Amazon return package. It arrived safely 6 days later, hundreds of miles away.
- 9 health benefits of drinking sugarcane juice in summer
- 10 benefits of incorporating almond oil into your daily diet
- From heart health to detoxification: 10 reasons to eat beetroot
- Why did a NASA spacecraft suddenly start talking gibberish after more than 45 years of operation? What fixed it?
- ICICI Bank shares climb nearly 5% after Q4 earnings; mcap soars by ₹36,555.4 crore
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market