What 'everybody knew' about Harvey Weinstein should have been enough for him to face consequences
Jamie McCarthy/Getty
When a scandal like this happens, we often hear that "everybody knew" what the offender had been up to, but the real story is more that everybody knew some fragments of what he'd been up to, and not necessarily the worst ones.
But we should consider whether Weinstein's public misbehavior - the stuff everybody really did know about - should have been unacceptable enough for him to face consequences years ago.
As The New Yorker's Ken Auletta wrote in 2002: "Those who have been witness to his outbursts, public and private, describe not a lovable rogue but, rather, a man with little self-control, whose tone of voice and whose body language can seem dangerous; at times, he appears about to burst with fury, his fists closed, his teeth clenched, his large head shaking as he loses the struggle to contain himself."
There are endless stories about Weinstein's volcanic temper and abuse towards all sorts of people - assistants, waitstaff, actors, other producers. Last week, Vulture collected 17 of them, spanning decades. He once threw Nathan Lane against the wall at Hillary Clinton's birthday party, according to Lane, because he didn't like a joke Lane had told about Rudy Giuliani.
"In Hollywood, everyone seems to have a favorite Harvey tirade," Vanity Fair wrote in March 2011. "The time he told The New York Observer he was 'the f------ sheriff of this f------ lawless piece of s--- town.' The time he screamed at Terry McAuliffe, then chairman of the Democratic Party, over some now forgotten bit of political trivia: 'You motherf-----! I'll rip your balls off!' (Weinstein denies this happened.)"
If a man behaved the way Weinstein behaved in public, shouldn't have been possible to deduce that he was up to something even worse in private?
In the coming weeks, there will be a lot of necessary discussion of why powerful predators like Weinstein get tolerated in entertainment and other industries. One possible step to contain private abuse is to better police publicly abusive behavior - to recognize that the stereotypical 'phone-throwing boss' is likely to misbehave in all sorts of unseen ways if his public abuse is tolerated.
- RBI Governor Das discusses ways to scale up UPI ecosystem with stakeholders
- People find ChatGPT to have a better moral compass than real humans, study reveals
- TVS Motor Company net profit rises 15% to ₹387 crore in March quarter
- Canara Bank Q4 profit rises 18% to ₹3,757 crore
- Indegene IPO allotment – How to check allotment, GMP, listing date and more
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market