A federal court ruled against Mike Pence's attempt to bar Syrian refugees, calling it 'nightmare speculation'
Thomson Reuters
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Indiana Gov. Mike Pence's policy on refugee resettlement on Monday, at one point calling Pence's arguments "nightmare speculation."
"The governor of Indiana believes, though without evidence, that some of these persons were sent to Syria by ISIS to engage in terrorism and now wish to infiltrate the United States in order to commit terrorist acts here," the decision by a panel of three judges reads.
It continues: "No evidence of this belief has been presented, however; it is nightmare speculation."
Gov. Pence, who is also the Republican vice presidential nominee, has been a vocal critic of President Obama's initiative to resettle 10,000 Syrian refugees this year, citing security concerns and the belief that ISIS operatives can sneak into the United States under the guise of refugees and commit terrorism on US soil.
Pence's stance against refugee resettlement reached its apotheosis following the Paris terror attacks in November 2015.
In light of the attacks, he announced that Indiana would not accept any incoming Syrian refugees and directed state agencies not to allocate federal funds towards refugee resettlement. His announcement came around the same time that his running mate and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump proposed a temporary ban on Muslim immigration into the US.
Exodus Refugee Immigration, an organization that works with refugees to resettle them in the United States, sued Pence in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union on the grounds that Pence did not have the constitutional right to ban refugees from Indiana.
In February, the court ruled in favor of Exodus and the ACLU, with Judge Tanya Walton Pratt noting that Pence's directive "in no way [furthered] the State's asserted interest in the safety of Indiana residents."
Pence's administration appealed the decision, and a hearing was set for September 14 at the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. In its decision today, the court unanimously upheld the lower court's ruling, emphasizing the stringency of the refugee vetting process while acknowledging that "there can be no certainty that no terrorist will ever slip through the screen."
- US buys 81 Soviet-era combat aircraft from Russia's ally costing on average less than $20,000 each, report says
- 2 states where home prices are falling because there are too many houses and not enough buyers
- A couple accidentally shipped their cat in an Amazon return package. It arrived safely 6 days later, hundreds of miles away.
- 9 health benefits of drinking sugarcane juice in summer
- 10 benefits of incorporating almond oil into your daily diet
- From heart health to detoxification: 10 reasons to eat beetroot
- Why did a NASA spacecraft suddenly start talking gibberish after more than 45 years of operation? What fixed it?
- ICICI Bank shares climb nearly 5% after Q4 earnings; mcap soars by ₹36,555.4 crore
- Nothing Phone (2a) blue edition launched
- JNK India IPO allotment date
- JioCinema New Plans
- Realme Narzo 70 Launched
- Apple Let Loose event
- Elon Musk Apology
- RIL cash flows
- Charlie Munger
- Feedbank IPO allotment
- Tata IPO allotment
- Most generous retirement plans
- Broadcom lays off
- Cibil Score vs Cibil Report
- Birla and Bajaj in top Richest
- Nestle Sept 2023 report
- India Equity Market